Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34245291›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2022

Species Tree Inference Methods Intended to Deal with Incomplete Lineage Sorting Are Robust to the Presence of Paralogs.

Zhi Yan, Megan L Smith, Peng Du, Matthew W Hahn, Luay Nakhleh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Discriminating models of trait evolution.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Paleobiome dynamics shaped a large Gondwanan plant radiation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Reply to Springer and Gatesy: The impact of long branches and misalignments on phylogenetic analysis is minimal.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhi YanDepartment of Computer Science, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Megan L SmithDepartment of Biology and Department of Computer Science, Indiana University, 1001 East Third Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Peng DuDepartment of Computer Science, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Matthew W HahnDepartment of Biology and Department of Computer Science, Indiana University, 1001 East Third Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Luay NakhlehDepartment of Computer Science, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many recent phylogenetic methods have focused on accurately inferring species trees when there is gene tree discordance due to incomplete lineage sorting (ILS). For almost all of these methods, and for phylogenetic methods in general, the data for each locus are assumed to consist of orthologous, single-copy sequences. Loci that are present in more than a single copy in any of the studied genomes are excluded from the data. These steps greatly reduce the number of loci available for analysis. The question we seek to answer in this study is: what happens if one runs such species tree inference methods on data where paralogy is present, in addition to or without ILS being present? Through simulation studies and analyses of two large biological data sets, we show that running such methods on data with paralogs can still provide accurate results. We use multiple different methods, some of which are based directly on the multispecies coalescent model, and some of which have been proven to be statistically consistent under it. We also treat the paralogous loci in multiple ways: from explicitly denoting them as paralogs, to randomly selecting one copy per species. In all cases, the inferred species trees are as accurate as equivalent analyses using single-copy orthologs. Our results have significant implications for the use of ILS-aware phylogenomic analyses, demonstrating that they do not have to be restricted to single-copy loci. This will greatly increase the amount of data that can be used for phylogenetic inference.[Gene duplication and loss; incomplete lineage sorting; multispecies coalescent; orthology; paralogy.].

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationModels, GeneticComputer SimulationGenomePhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID34245291
PMCPMC8978208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.