ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2021
Prescription stimulant brand name recognition among a national sample of 10- to 18-year-old youth.
Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prescription stimulant brand name recognition among a national sample of 10- to 18-year-old youth.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe majority of prescription drugs, including prescription stimulants, are marketed using multiple brand names, doses, and formulations. There is limited research on the extent to which individuals correctly identify medication by brand name or packaging, but such identification is important for epidemiological studies especially among youth. Testing the ability of youth to identify medications was one aim of the National Monitoring of Prescription Stimulants Study, which focused on the prevalence of prescription stimulant use among youth.
methodsUsing the entertainment venue intercept method, youth 10 to 18 years of age (n = 11,048) were recruited across 10 metropolitan areas throughout the United States, shown pictures of eight formulations of prescription stimulants, and asked to identify them by name, dosage, and formulation.
resultsOverall, 27% of youth reported having seen one of the eight stimulant formulations and between 2% and 70% correctly identified name, dose, and formulation. Youths' reports of having seen and correctly identifying medication increased with age except for Daytrana
conclusionsThese results provide strong evidence of the need for more stringent methods for youth to report drug use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.