Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34245078›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2021

Utilization of drugs with reports on potential efficacy or harm on COVID-19 before, during, and after the first pandemic wave.

Salka Enners, Gabriele Gradl, Marita Kieble, Michael Böhm, Ulrich Laufs, Martin Schulz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Appropriateness of the Prescription and Use of Medicines: An Old Concept but More Relevant than Ever.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Salka EnnersGerman Institute for Drug Use Evaluation (DAPI), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6706-295X
Gabriele GradlGerman Institute for Drug Use Evaluation (DAPI), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1810-090X
Marita KiebleGerman Institute for Drug Use Evaluation (DAPI), Berlin, Germany.
Michael BöhmDepartment of Internal Medicine III - Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2976-2514
Ulrich LaufsDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2620-9323
Martin SchulzGerman Institute for Drug Use Evaluation (DAPI), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5876-7322

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeConflicting information on potential benefits of drugs as well as reports on hypothetical harm of commonly used drugs in COVID-19 treatment have challenged clinicians and healthcare systems. We analyzed the change in ambulatory drug utilization before, during, and after the first wave of the pandemic in 2020.

methodsWe explored dispensing data of nearly 19 000 pharmacies at the expense of the statutory health insurance funds covering 88% of Germany's population. We analyzed utilization of publicly discussed drugs with conflicting information. Drug utilization as number of packages dispensed per week from January to June 2020, reflecting 314 million claims, was compared with 2019.

resultsUtilization of hydroxychloroquine increased +110% during March 2020 and then slightly decreased until week April 13-19. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and simvastatin/atorvastatin increased, +78% and +74%, respectively, and subsequently decreased below 2019 levels. Utilization of azithromycin and all systemic antibiotics decreased continuously from March 2-8 until June to levels considerably lower compared to 2019 (June 22-28: azithromycin: -55%, all systemic antibiotics: -27%). Pneumococcal vaccines utilization initially increased +373%, followed by supply shortages. Paracetamol utilization showed an initial increase of +111%, mainly caused by an increase of over-the-counter dispensings.

conclusionsApart from the pandemic itself, the data suggest that dissemination of misinformation and unsound speculations as well as supply shortages influenced drug prescribing, utilization, and purchasing behavior. The findings can inform post-pandemic policy to prevent unfounded over- and underprescribing and off-label use as well as drug shortages during a public health crisis.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentPandemicsDrug UtilizationHumansCOVID-19drug utilizationhydroxychloroquinepandemicpharmacy claimsrenin-angiotensin-aldosterone systemstatins

Identifiers

PMID34245078
PMCPMC8441787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.