Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34244998›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2021

Diagnostic criteria for retained products of conception-A scoping review.

Charlotte C Hamel, Steffi van Wessel, Alasdair Carnegy, Sjors F P J Coppus, Marc P M L Snijders, Justin Clark, Mark H Emanuel

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Post protocol residual thickness as a negative predictor for pharmacological treatment in early pregnancy loss.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Retained Products of Conception (RPOC): Diagnosis, Complication & Management.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Diagnostic criteria for retained products of conception-A scoping review.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Charlotte C HamelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3782-6669
Steffi van WesselDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2725-7696
Alasdair CarnegyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Sjors F P J CoppusDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
Marc P M L SnijdersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Justin ClarkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Mark H EmanuelDepartment of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNumerous studies have been performed assessing optimal treatment regimens for evacuating (retained) products of conception from the uterus, but standardized criteria for diagnosing retained products of conception (RPOC) are still lacking. We aim to provide an overview of diagnostic criteria in current literature, used to diagnose RPOC after induced first-trimester abortion or early pregnancy loss. MATERIAL AND

methodsPubmed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library were searched systematically up until March 2020 for English articles reporting on induced abortion or early pregnancy loss. Articles not specifying diagnostic criteria used to assess completeness of treatment were excluded, as were conference abstracts, expert opinions, reviews, and case reports. Four elements of diagnostic criteria were described: diagnostic tools, parameters used within these tools, applied cut-off values, and timing of follow up. Additionally, a meta-analysis was performed assessing diagnostic qualities of the most often applied diagnostic tool and parameter.

resultsThe search strategy yielded 1233 unique articles, of which 248 were included, with a total of 339 517 participants. In the 79 included randomized controlled trials, six diagnostic tools to assess RPOC were identified, combined in 14 ways, with 55 different cut-off values. In 169 observational studies, seven diagnostic tools were identified, used in 28 combinations, applying 89 different cut-off values. Transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial thickness with a cut-off value of at least 15 mm indicating RPOC, was used most frequently. In the timing of follow-up there was great variation, with 55 and 107 different combinations in randomized controlled trials and observational studies, respectively. Assessment of treatment success was scheduled most often around 2 weeks after treatment. Diagnostic qualities of endometrial thickness of 15 mm or more was not adequately assessed.

conclusionsThere is wide variation in the way RPOC are assessed, and the criteria used to define RPOC following induced abortion and early pregnancy loss; ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial thickness, with a cut-off of 15 mm or more 2 weeks after primary treatment is the most widely used diagnostic approach. A meta-analysis on diagnostic accuracy of endometrial thickness of 15 mm or more did not lead to solid results. These findings can be a first step to develop a workable standard of establishing RPOC after induced abortion or early pregnancy loss.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousFemaleHumansPlacenta, RetainedPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstUltrasonography, Prenatalearly pregnancy lossinduced abortionmiscarriageretained products of conceptionreviewtermination of pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID34244998
PMCPMC9291104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.