Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34244972›Full record

ReviewCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2021

The impact of mitochondria on cancer treatment resistance.

Michelle van der Merwe, Gustav van Niekerk, Carla Fourie, Manisha du Plessis, Anna-Mart Engelbrecht

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michelle van der MerweDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa. 20331193@sun.ac.za.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4749-0708
Gustav van NiekerkDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Carla FourieDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Manisha du PlessisDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Anna-Mart EngelbrechtDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Stellenbosch University · ZA

Funding

Cancer Association of South Africa Cancer Association of South AfricaMedical Research Council (MRC) of South Africa Medical Research Council (MRC) of South Africathe National Research Foundation (NRF) the National Research Foundation (NRF)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ability of cancer cells to develop treatment resistance is one of the primary factors that prevent successful treatment. Although initially thought to be dysfunctional in cancer, mitochondria are significant players that mediate treatment resistance. Literature indicates that cancer cells reutilize their mitochondria to facilitate cancer progression and treatment resistance. However, the mechanisms by which the mitochondria promote treatment resistance have not yet been fully elucidated. CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES: Here, we describe various means by which mitochondria can promote treatment resistance. For example, mutations in tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle enzymes, i.e., fumarate hydratase and isocitrate dehydrogenase, result in the accumulation of the oncometabolites fumarate and 2-hydroxyglutarate, respectively. These oncometabolites may promote treatment resistance by upregulating the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) pathway, inhibiting the anti-tumor immune response, or promoting angiogenesis. Furthermore, stromal cells can donate intact mitochondria to cancer cells after therapy to restore mitochondrial functionality and facilitate treatment resistance. Targeting mitochondria is, therefore, a feasible strategy that may dampen treatment resistance. Analysis of tumoral DNA may also be used to guide treatment choices. It will indicate whether enzymatic mutations are present in the TCA cycle and, if so, whether the mutations or their downstream signaling pathways can be targeted. This may improve treatment outcomes by inhibiting treatment resistance or promoting the effectiveness of anti-angiogenic agents or immunotherapy.

Indexed as

MutationAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCitric Acid CycleDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEnergy MetabolismHumansMitochondriaModels, GeneticNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsNF-E2-Related Factor 2Oxidative PhosphorylationSignal TransductionAntineoplastic AgentsNFE2L2 protein, humanNF-E2-Related Factor 22-HydroxyglutarateFumarateMitochondriaMitochondrial transferTreatment resistance

Identifiers

PMID34244972
PMCPMC12980708
OpenAlexW3179732892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.