Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34244968›Full record

ArticleAmbio2021

South-Siberian mountain mires: Perspectives on a potentially vulnerable remote source of biodiversity.

Irina I Volkova, Terry V Callaghan, Igor V Volkov, Natalia A Chernova, Anastasia I Volkova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Irina I VolkovaTomsk State University, 36 Lenina Pr, Tomsk, Russia, 634050. volkovhome@yandex.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8399-9504
Terry V CallaghanUniversity of Sheffield, Alfred Denny Building, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK.
Igor V VolkovTomsk State Pedagogical University, 60 Kievskaya St, Tomsk, Russia, 634061.
Natalia A ChernovaInstitute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological Systems of Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch, 10/3 Akademichesky Pr, Tomsk, Russia, 634021.
Anastasia I VolkovaInstitute of Archaeology & Ethnography of Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch, 17 Lavrentieva Pr, Novosibirsk, Russia, 630090.

Funding

NIR Project 0264-2019-0010Russian Science Foundation Project #20-67-46018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes in climate, land-use and pollution are having disproportionate impacts on ecosystems and biodiversity of arctic and mountain ecosystems. While these impacts are well-documented for many areas of the Arctic and alpine regions, some isolated and inaccessible mountain areas are poorly studied. Furthermore, even in well-studied regions, assessments of biodiversity and species responses to environmental change are biased towards vascular plants and cryptogams, particularly bryophytes are far less represented. This paper aims to document the environments of the remote and inaccessible Altai-Sayan mountain mires and particularly their bryofloras where threatened species exist and species new to the regional flora are still being found. As these mountain mires are relatively inaccessible, changes in drivers of change and their ecosystem and biodiversity impacts have not been monitored. However, the remoteness of the mires has so far protected them and their species. In this study, we describe the mires, their bryophyte species and the expected impacts of environmental stressors to bring attention to the urgency of documenting change and conserving these pristine ecosystems.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEcosystemArctic RegionsClimateClimate ChangeSiberiaBiodiversityBryophytesClimate changeMountain miresSiberia

Identifiers

PMID34244968
PMCPMC8269984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.