Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34244826›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2021

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of resistant depression: changes of specific neurotransmitter precursor amino acids.

F Leblhuber, S Geisler, D Ehrlich, K Steiner, G Reibnegger, Dietmar Fuchs, K Kurz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

F LeblhuberDepartment of Gerontology, Kepler University Clinic, Linz, Austria.
S GeislerInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Innsbruck Medical University, Innrain 80, Room M04-313, 6020, BiocenterInnsbruck, Austria.
D EhrlichDepartment of Gerontology, Kepler University Clinic, Linz, Austria.
K SteinerDepartment of Gerontology, Kepler University Clinic, Linz, Austria.
G ReibneggerDivision of Physiological Chemistry, Otto-Loewi Research Center, Graz Medical University, Graz, Austria.
Dietmar FuchsInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Innsbruck Medical University, Innrain 80, Room M04-313, 6020, BiocenterInnsbruck, Austria. dietmar.fuchs@i-med.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0003-1627-9563
K KurzDepartment of Internal Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
Innsbruck Medical University · ATKepler Universitätsklinikum · ATMedical University of Graz · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment-resistant major depression offers an alternative therapy, since more than every third patient is not responding to adequate antidepressive treatment. In this interventional study safety, symptom development and changes of serum concentrations of neurotransmitter precursor amino acids, of immune activation and inflammation markers, of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), nitrite as well as of salivary amylase were measured before and after a frontal polar cortex stimulation using rTMS as add-on treatment in 38 patients with treatment-resistant depression. Out of these, 17 patients received sham stimulation as a control. Treatment was well tolerated: with the exception of one patient of the verum group, who described discomfort during the second treatment, no serious adverse effects were observed. Improvement of depression with a significant decrease in the HAMD-7 scale (p = 0.001) was found in patients treated with rTMS, but not in sham-treated patients. Furthermore, serum phenylalanine and tyrosine dropped significantly (p = 0.03 and p = 0.027, respectively) in rTMS-treated patients. The kynurenine to tryptophan ratio (Kyn/Trp) tended to decrease under rTMS (p = 0.07). In addition, associations between concentrations of BDNF and neopterin as well as serum nitrite levels were found in patients after rTMS treatment, which indicates an influence of immune regulatory circuits on BDNF levels. In the sham-treated patients, no changes of biomarker concentrations were observed. Results show that rTMS is effective in the treatment of resistant depression. rTMS appears to influence the enzyme phenylalanine hydroxylase, which plays a central role in the biosynthesis of neurotransmitter precursors tyrosine and dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA).

Indexed as

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAmino AcidsDepressionHumansNeurotransmitter AgentsPrefrontal CortexTreatment OutcomeAmino AcidsNeurotransmitter AgentsPhenylalaninePhenylalanine hydroxylaseTranscranial magnetic stimulationTreatment-resistant depressionTyrosine

Identifiers

PMID34244826
PMCPMC8321996
OpenAlexW3182571246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.