Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34244701›Full record

ArticleAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2022

Impact of Relationship and Communication Variables on Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Advanced Cancer Caregivers.

Amy K Otto, Emily C Soriano, Wendy C Birmingham, Susan T Vadaparampil, Richard E Heyman, Lee Ellington, Maija Reblin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Amy K OttoDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Emily C SorianoDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Wendy C BirminghamDepartment of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
Susan T VadaparampilDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Richard E HeymanFamily Translational Research Group, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Lee EllingtonCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Maija ReblinDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3108-465X
Moffitt Cancer Center · USBrigham Young University · USNew York University · USUniversity of Delaware · USUniversity of Utah · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

Behavioral Oncology Education & Career DevelopmentT32CA090314 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI Vani N Simmons, SUSAN T VADAPARAMPIL · 2019 to 2026
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA090314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer impacts both patients and their family caregivers. Evidence suggests that caregiving stress, including the strain of taking on a new role, can elevate the risk of numerous health conditions, including high blood pressure (BP). However, the caregiver's psychosocial experiences, including their interpersonal relationship with the patient, may buffer some of the negative physiological consequences of caregiving. PURPOSE: To examine the influence of psychosocial contextual variables on caregiver ambulatory BP.

methodsParticipants were 81 spouse-caregivers of patients with advanced gastrointestinal or thoracic cancer. For an entire day at home with the patient, caregivers wore an ambulatory BP monitor that took readings at random intervals. Immediately after each BP reading, caregivers reported on physical circumstances (e.g., posture, activity) and psychosocial experiences since the last BP measurement, including affect, caregiver and patient disclosure, and role perceptions (i.e., feeling more like a spouse vs. caregiver). Multilevel modeling was used to examine concurrent and lagged effects of psychosocial variables on systolic and diastolic BP, controlling for momentary posture, activity, negative affect, and time.

resultsFeeling more like a caregiver (vs. spouse) was associated with lower systolic BP at the same time point. Patient disclosure to the caregiver since the previous BP reading was associated with higher diastolic BP. No lagged effects were statistically significant.

conclusionsCaregivers' psychosocial experiences can have immediate physiological effects. Future research should examine possible cognitive and behavioral mechanisms of these effects, as well as longer-term effects of caregiver role perceptions and patient disclosure on caregiver psychological and physical health.

Indexed as

CaregiversNeoplasmsBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCommunicationHumansStress, PsychologicalAmbulatory blood pressure monitoringCancerCaregiverCouplesDisclosureRole

Identifiers

PMID34244701
PMCPMC8976288
OpenAlexW3182557809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.