Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34244648›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2021

Current technology in endodontic instrumentation: advances in metallurgy and manufacture.

Faith Campbell, Joanne Cunliffe, James Darcey

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Faith CampbellUniversity of Sheffield, Academic Unit of Oral Health, Dentistry and Society, School of Clinical Dentistry, 19 Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA, UK. faith.campbell@sheffield.ac.uk.
Joanne CunliffeUniversity of Manchester, Division of Dentistry, Higher Cambridge Street, Coupland 3, Manchester, M15 6FH, UK.
James DarceyUniversity of Manchester Dental Hospital, Restorative Dentistry, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester, M15 6FH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the introduction of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments, there have been a myriad of developments which can be confusing and sometimes contradictory. This article seeks to review and articulate these advances, and allow the reader to better understand the benefits and the limitations of the systems available. Ultimately, this helps clinicians to engage more confidently with trade and have a more informed choice of the most appropriate file to use for each individual endodontic case. All this should facilitate more predictable endodontic outcomes.

Indexed as

Dental InstrumentsRoot Canal PreparationDental AlloysEquipment DesignMetallurgyTechnologyTitaniumDental AlloysTitanium

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.