Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34244544›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

The benefit of the diffusion kurtosis imaging in presurgical evaluation in patients with focal MR-negative epilepsy.

Michaela Bartoňová, Marek Bartoň, Pavel Říha, Lubomír Vojtíšek, Milan Brázdil, Ivan Rektor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Advanced neuroimaging techniques in epilepsy.Current opinion in neurology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michaela BartoňováCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Multimodal and Functional Neuroimaging Research Group, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
Marek BartoňCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Multimodal and Functional Neuroimaging Research Group, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
Pavel ŘíhaCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Multimodal and Functional Neuroimaging Research Group, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1322-2038
Lubomír VojtíšekCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Multimodal and Functional Neuroimaging Research Group, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4027-6568
Milan BrázdilCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Multimodal and Functional Neuroimaging Research Group, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7979-2343
Ivan RektorCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Multimodal and Functional Neuroimaging Research Group, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic. irektor@med.muni.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9635-7404
Central European Institute of Technology · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effectivity of diffusion-weighted MRI methods in detecting the epileptogenic zone (EZ) was tested. Patients with refractory epilepsy (N=25) who subsequently underwent resective surgery were recruited. First, the extent of white matter (WM) asymmetry from mean kurtosis (MK) was calculated in order to detect the lobe with the strongest impairment. Second, a newly developed metric was used, reflecting a selection of brain areas with concurrently increased mean Diffusivity, reduced fractional Anisotropy, and reduced mean Kurtosis (iDrArK). A two-step EZ detection was performed as (1) lobe-specific detection, (2) iDrArK voxel-wise detection (with a possible lobe-specific restriction if the result of the first step was significant in a given subject). The method results were compared with the surgery resection zones. From the whole cohort (N=25), the numbers of patients with significant results were: 10 patients in lobe detection and 9 patients in EZ detection. From these subsets of patients with significant results, the impaired lobe was successfully detected with 100% accuracy; the EZ was successfully detected with 89% accuracy. The detection of the EZ using iDrArK was substantially more successful when compared with solo diffusional parameters (or their pairwise combinations). For a subgroup with significant results from step one (N=10), iDrArK without lobe restriction achieved 37.5% accuracy; lobe-restricted iDrArK achieved 100% accuracy. The study shows the plausibility of MK for detecting widespread WM changes and the benefit of combining different diffusional voxel-wise parameters.

Indexed as

Diffusion Tensor ImagingEpilepsies, PartialHumans

Identifiers

PMID34244544
PMCPMC8270902
OpenAlexW3182851086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.