Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34244505›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Improved CRISPR genome editing using small highly active and specific engineered RNA-guided nucleases.

Moritz J Schmidt, Ashish Gupta, Christien Bednarski, Stefanie Gehrig-Giannini, Florian Richter, Christian Pitzler, Michael Gamalinda, Christina Galonska, Ryo Takeuchi, Kui Wang and 18 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Recent advances in therapeutic gene-editing technologies.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Moritz J Schmidt *Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany.
Ashish Gupta *Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany.
Christien Bednarski *Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany.
Stefanie Gehrig-GianniniBayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany.
Florian RichterBayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany.
Christian PitzlerBayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany.
Michael GamalindaBayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany.
Christina GalonskaBayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany.
Ryo TakeuchiCasebia Therapeutics LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Kui WangCasebia Therapeutics LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Caroline ReissCasebia Therapeutics LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Kerstin DehneBayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany.
Michael J LukasonCRISPR Therapeutics INC, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Akiko NomaCasebia Therapeutics LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Cindy Park-WindholCasebia Therapeutics LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Mariacarmela AlloccaCasebia Therapeutics LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Albena KantardzhievaCasebia Therapeutics LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Shailendra SaneCasebia Therapeutics LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Karolina KosakowskaCasebia Therapeutics LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Brian CaffertyCasebia Therapeutics LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jan TebbeBayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany.
Sarah J SpencerCRISPR Therapeutics INC, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Scott MunzerCasebia Therapeutics LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Christopher J ChengCasebia Therapeutics LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Abraham ScariaCasebia Therapeutics LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Andrew M ScharenbergCasebia Therapeutics LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA.
André CohnenBayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany. andre.cohnen@bayer.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9349-3331
Wayne M CocoBayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany. wayne.coco@icloud.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2551-2291
Akebia Therapeutics (United States) · USBayer (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Streptococcus pyogenes (Spy) Cas9 has potential as a component of gene therapeutics for incurable diseases. One of its limitations is its large size, which impedes its formulation and delivery in therapeutic applications. Smaller Cas9s are an alternative, but lack robust activity or specificity and frequently recognize longer PAMs. Here, we investigated four uncharacterized, smaller Cas9s and found three employing a "GG" dinucleotide PAM similar to SpyCas9. Protein engineering generated synthetic RNA-guided nucleases (sRGNs) with editing efficiencies and specificities exceeding even SpyCas9 in vitro and in human cell lines on disease-relevant targets. sRGN mRNA lipid nanoparticles displayed manufacturing advantages and high in vivo editing efficiency in the mouse liver. Finally, sRGNs, but not SpyCas9, could be packaged into all-in-one AAV particles with a gRNA and effected robust in vivo editing of non-human primate (NHP) retina photoreceptors. Human gene therapy efforts are expected to benefit from these improved alternatives to existing CRISPR nucleases.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorCRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Cas SystemsDependovirusDisease Models, AnimalGene EditingGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHEK293 CellsHumansMacaca fascicularisMaleMiceParvovirinaeProtein EngineeringCRISPR-Associated Protein 9RibonucleasesRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems

Identifiers

PMID34244505
PMCPMC8271026
OpenAlexW3179884752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.