Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34244490›Full record

Observational studyNature communications2021

A generative network model of neurodevelopmental diversity in structural brain organization.

Danyal Akarca, Petra E Vértes, Edward T Bullmore, CALM team, Duncan E Astle

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Heterochronicity shapes brain network formation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The topology of adolescent mental health.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Shaping dynamical neural computations using spatiotemporal constraints.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Human adolescent brain similarity development is different for paralimbic versus neocortical zones.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Danyal AkarcaMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. danyal.akarca@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5931-0295
Petra E VértesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Edward T BullmoreDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8955-8283
CALM team
Duncan E AstleMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC-A0606-5PQ41Medical Research Council MC_G0802534Medical Research Council MC_U105559837Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/10Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The formation of large-scale brain networks, and their continual refinement, represent crucial developmental processes that can drive individual differences in cognition and which are associated with multiple neurodevelopmental conditions. But how does this organization arise, and what mechanisms drive diversity in organization? We use generative network modeling to provide a computational framework for understanding neurodevelopmental diversity. Within this framework macroscopic brain organization, complete with spatial embedding of its organization, is an emergent property of a generative wiring equation that optimizes its connectivity by renegotiating its biological costs and topological values continuously over time. The rules that govern these iterative wiring properties are controlled by a set of tightly framed parameters, with subtle differences in these parameters steering network growth towards different neurodiverse outcomes. Regional expression of genes associated with the simulations converge on biological processes and cellular components predominantly involved in synaptic signaling, neuronal projection, catabolic intracellular processes and protein transport. Together, this provides a unifying computational framework for conceptualizing the mechanisms and diversity in neurodevelopment, capable of integrating different levels of analysis-from genes to cognition.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAdolescentBrainChildChild DevelopmentCognitionCohort StudiesComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetNeurogenesis

Identifiers

PMID34244490
PMCPMC8270998
OpenAlexW3178135957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.