Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34244430›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Reply to Linton: Perspectival interference up close.

Jorge Morales, Axel Bax, Chaz Firestone

Abstract readLetterComment
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Minimal theory of 3D vision: new approach to visual scale and visual shape.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. New Approaches to 3D Vision.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. V1 as an egocentric cognitive map.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jorge MoralesDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218; chaz@jhu.edu jorge.morales@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5825-4909
Axel BaxDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.
Chaz FirestoneDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218; chaz@jhu.edu jorge.morales@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1247-2422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID34244430
PMCPMC8285896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.