Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34244285›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Strategies and challenges in Kerala's response to the initial phase of COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative descriptive study.

Kannamkottapilly Chandrasekharan Prajitha, Arya Rahul, Sujatha Chintha, Gopakumar Soumya, Meenu Maheswari Suresh, Anjana Nalina Kumari Kesavan Nair, Mathew Joseph Valamparampil, Aravind Reghukumar, Sriram Venkitaraman, Thekkumkara Surendran Nair Anish

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. 'BMJ global health · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kannamkottapilly Chandrasekharan PrajithaCommunity Medicine, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Arya RahulCommunity Medicine, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Sujatha ChinthaCommunity Medicine, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Gopakumar SoumyaCommunity Medicine, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Meenu Maheswari SureshCommunity Medicine, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Anjana Nalina Kumari Kesavan NairCommunity Medicine, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Mathew Joseph ValamparampilDistrict Medical Office(Health), Department of Health Services, Kasargode, Kerala, India.
Aravind ReghukumarInfectious Disease, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Sriram VenkitaramanDepartment of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3764-5809
Thekkumkara Surendran Nair AnishCommunity Medicine, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India doctrinets@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6957-5895
Government Medical College and Hospital · INGovernment of Kerala · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand the structures and strategies that helped Kerala in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic, the challenges faced by the state and how it was tackled.

designQualitative descriptive study using focus group discussions and in-depth interviews.

settingState of Kerala, India.

participants29 participants: four focus group discussions and eight in-depth interviews. Participants were chosen purposively based on their involvement in decision-making and implementation of COVID-19 control activities, from the department of health and family welfare, police, revenue, local self-government and community-based organisations. Districts, panchayats (local bodies) and primary health centres (PHCs) were selected based on epidemiological features of the area like the intensity of disease transmission and preventive/containment activities carried out in that particular area to capture the wide range of activities undertaken in the state.

resultsThe study identified five major themes that can inform best practices viz social capital, robust public health system, participation and volunteerism, health system preparedness, and challenges. This study was a real-time exploration of the intricacies of COVID-19 management in a low/middle-income country and the model can serve as an example for other states and nations to emulate or adjust accordingly.

conclusionThe study shows the impact of synergy of these themes towards more effective solutions; however, further research is much needed in examining the relationship between these factors and their relevance in policy decisions.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHumansIndiaQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2COVID-19health policypublic health

Identifiers

PMID34244285
PMCPMC8275365
OpenAlexW3181270354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.