Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34244274›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Implementation science protocol for a participatory, theory-informed implementation research programme in the context of health system strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET-ImplementER).

Nadine Seward, Jamie Murdoch, Charlotte Hanlon, Ricardo Araya, Wei Gao, Richard Harding, Crick Lund, Saba Hinrichs-Krapels, Rosie Mayston, Muralikrishnan Kartha and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Challenges in Implementing the National Health Response to COVID-19 in Senegal.Global implementation research and applications · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Nadine SewardCentre for Implementation Science, Department of Health Services and Population Research, King's College London, London, UK nadine.seward@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4821-9437
Jamie MurdochSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Charlotte HanlonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Health Service and Population Research Department, Centre for Global Mental Health, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7937-3226
Ricardo ArayaInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Health Service and Population Research Department, Centre for Global Mental Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Wei GaoDepartment of Palliative Care and Policy, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8298-3415
Richard HardingDepartment of Palliative Care and Policy, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9653-8689
Crick LundInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Health Service and Population Research Department, Centre for Global Mental Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Saba Hinrichs-KrapelsThe Policy Institute, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9043-8847
Rosie MaystonKing's Global Health Institute, King's College London, London, UK.
Muralikrishnan KarthaKing's Health Economics, King's College London, London, UK.
Martin PrinceKing's Global Health Institute, King's College London, London, UK.
Jane SandallDept of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, FoLSM, King's College London, London, UK.
Graham ThornicroftCentre for Implementation Science, Department of Health Services and Population Research, King's College London, London, UK.
Ruth VerheyResearch Support Centre, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0002-5959-1891
Nick SevdalisCentre for Implementation Science, Department of Health Services and Population Research, King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Zimbabwe · ZW

Funding

COBALT: Comorbid Affective Disorders, AIDS/HIV, and Long Term HealthR01MH100470 · NIMH · KING'S COLLEGE LONDON · PI FAIRALL, LARA ROSEMARY, PETERSEN, INGE · 2013 to 2018
$2.0M
Medical Research Council MR/R023697/1Medical Research Council MR/S001255/1NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesASSET (Health System Strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa) is a health system strengthening (HSS) programme involving eight work-packages (ie, a research study that addresses a specific need for HSS) that aims to develop solutions that support high-quality care. Here we present the protocol for the implementation science (IS) theme within ASSET (ASSET-ImplmentER) that aims to understand what HSS interventions work, for whom and how, and how IS methodologies can be adapted to improve the HSS interventions within resource-poor contexts. SETTINGS: Publicly funded health facilities in rural and urban areas in in Ethiopia, South Africa, Sierra Leone, and Zimbabwe.

participantsResearch staff including principal investigators, coinvestigators, field staff, PhD students, and research assistants.

interventionsWork-packages use a mixed-methods effectiveness-effectiveness hybrid designs. At the end of the pre-implementation phase, a workshop is held whereby the IS theme, jointly with ASSET work-packages apply IS determinant frameworks to research findings to identify factors that influence the effectiveness of delivering evidence-informed care. Determinants are used to select a set of HSS interventions for further evaluation, where work-packages also theorise selective mechanisms.

conclusionsWe use a novel combination of IS methods at a programmatic level to facilitate comparisons of determinants and mechanisms that influence the effectiveness of HSS interventions in achieving implementation outcomes across different contexts. The study also contributes conceptual development and clarification at the underdeveloped interface of IS, HSS and global health.The ASSET-ImplementER theme is considered minimal risk as we only interview researchers involved in the different work-packages. To this effect we have received approval from King's College London Ethics Committee for research that is considered minimal risk (Reference number: MRA-20/21-21772).

Indexed as

Implementation ScienceEthiopiaHumansLondonSierra LeoneSouth AfricaZimbabwepublic healthstatistics & research methodstropical medicine

Identifiers

PMID34244274
PMCPMC8268893
OpenAlexW3178665153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.