ArticleBMJ open2021
Current status of health systems financing and oversight for end-stage kidney disease care: a cross-sectional global survey.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimal patient care in advanced chronic kidney disease progressing to kidney failure.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026Review
- Geographical Distribution of Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Receiving Hemodialysis Care in Northwest Iran: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Nature Medicine Commission on dialysis policy in low- and middle-income countries.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Development of a nomogram for identifying prevalent medication discrepancy in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a multicenter cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Quality of Life in Patients with CKD With Catastrophic Health Care Expenditures: A National Study From Thailand.Kidney medicine · 2025Article
- Population-level barriers to home hemodialysis implementation: a public health systems analysis of adoption readiness, health equity, and policy implications in China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Improvement in Unhealthy Behaviors Among Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Receiving Integrated Care at Community Hospitals in Thailand.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2025Article
- Cognitive impairment assessed by static and dynamic changes of spontaneous brain activity during end stage renal disease patients on early hemodialysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram to estimate fatigue probability in hemodialysis patients.Renal failure · 2024Article
- Effect of Sodium Thiosulfate Pre-Treatment on Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Kidney Transplantation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- The impact of population ageing on the burden of chronic kidney disease.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2024Review
- Socioeconomic Position and Health Among Children and Adolescents With CKD Across the Life-Course.Kidney international reports · 2024Review
- Twenty years of the French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network.Clinical kidney journal · 2024Article
- Associations of Glucometabolic Indices with Aortic Stiffness in Patients Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis with and without Diabetes Mellitus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Inequities in kidney health and kidney care.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2023Review
- Introducing the International Home Dialysis Consortium.Kidney international reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Preparing for the Unexpected, Supporting the Vulnerable-A Perspective From Lebanon and Sri Lanka.Kidney international reports · 2023Article
- Providing "Free" Access to Dialysis and Transplant to the Disfranchised. A Sustainable Model for Low and Low Middle Income Countries (LMICs).Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023Article
- National health policies and strategies for addressing chronic kidney disease: Data from the International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
45 authors at 20 institutions in 22 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe Global Kidney Health Atlas (GKHA) is a multinational, cross-sectional survey designed to assess the current capacity for kidney care across all world regions. The 2017 GKHA involved 125 countries and identified significant gaps in oversight, funding and infrastructure to support care for patients with kidney disease, especially in lower-middle-income countries. Here, we report results from the survey for the second iteration of the GKHA conducted in 2018, which included specific questions about health financing and oversight of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) care worldwide.
settingA cross-sectional global survey.
participantsKey stakeholders from 182 countries were invited to participate. Of those, stakeholders from 160 countries participated and were included. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Primary outcomes included cost of kidney replacement therapy (KRT), funding for dialysis and transplantation, funding for conservative kidney management, extent of universal health coverage, out-of-pocket costs for KRT, within-country variability in ESKD care delivery and oversight systems for ESKD care. Outcomes were determined from a combination of desk research and input from key stakeholders in participating countries.
results160 countries (covering 98% of the world's population) responded to the survey. Economic factors were identified as the top barrier to optimal ESKD care in 99 countries (64%). Full public funding for KRT was more common than for conservative kidney management (43% vs 28%). Among countries that provided at least some public coverage for KRT, 75% covered all citizens. Within-country variation in ESKD care delivery was reported in 40% of countries. Oversight of ESKD care was present in all high-income countries but was absent in 13% of low-income, 3% of lower-middle-income, and 10% of upper-middle-income countries.
conclusionSignificant gaps and variability exist in the public funding and oversight of ESKD care in many countries, particularly for those in low-income and lower-middle-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.