Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34244154›Full record

Trial reportCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2021

Economic Evaluation of Web- versus Telephone-based Interventions to Simultaneously Increase Colorectal and Breast Cancer Screening Among Women.

Danmeng Huang, David R Lairson, Tong H Chung, Patrick O Monahan, Susan M Rawl, Victoria L Champion

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Danmeng HuangSchool of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas.
David R LairsonSchool of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas. David.R.Lairson@uth.tmc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2285-0527
Tong H ChungSchool of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-6135-1654
Patrick O MonahanDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Susan M RawlSchool of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0003-2052-2853
Victoria L ChampionSchool of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0002-6153-0713
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USIndiana University Health · USRichard M. Fairbanks Foundation · US

Funding

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE EDUCATION--CANCER PREVENTION/CONTROLR25CA057712 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MULLEN, PATRICIA DOLAN · 1992 to 2017
$8.6M
Increasing Colorectal and Breast Cancer Screnning in WomenR01CA136940 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHAMPION, VICTORIA LEE · 2010 to 2014
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136940NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening for colorectal and breast cancer is considered cost effective, but limited evidence exists on cost-effectiveness of screening promotion interventions that simultaneously target both cancers. Increasing Colorectal and Breast Cancer Screening (Project COBRA), a randomized controlled trial conducted in the community, examined the cost-effectiveness of an innovative tailored web-based intervention compared with tailored telephone counseling and usual care. Screening status at 6 months was obtained by participant surveys plus medical record reviews. Cost was prospectively measured from the patient and provider perspectives using time logs and project invoices. Relative efficiency of the interventions was quantified by the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Nonparametric bootstrapping and net benefit regression analysis were used to assess statistical uncertainty of the results. The average cost per participant to implement the Phone counseling, Web-based, and Web + Phone counseling interventions were $277, $314, and $337, respectively. Comparing Phone counseling with usual care resulted in an additional cost of $300 (95% confidence interval [CI]: $283-$320) per cancer screening test and $421 (95% CI: $400-$441) per additional person screened in the target population. Phone counseling alone was more cost-effective than the Web + Phone intervention. Web-based intervention alone was more costly but less effective than the Phone counseling. When simultaneously promoting screening for both colorectal and breast cancer the Web-based intervention was less cost-effective compared with Phone and Web + Phone strategies. The results suggest that targeting multiple cancer screening may improve the cost-effectiveness of cancer screening interventions. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: This study informs researchers, decision makers, healthcare providers, and payers about the improved cost-effectiveness of targeting multiple cancer screenings for cancer early detection programs.

Indexed as

Internet-Based InterventionTelephoneAgedBreast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsCost-Benefit AnalysisEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePatient Education as TopicPatient ParticipationPatient SelectionReminder SystemsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34244154
PMCPMC8416925
OpenAlexW3183093910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.