Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34243808›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

Effectiveness of self-administered mirror therapy on upper extremity impairments and function of acute stroke patients: study protocol.

Venkadesan Rajendran, Deepa Jeevanantham, Céline Larivière, Ravinder-Jeet Singh, Lisa Zeman, Padma Papuri

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04542772 (Effectiveness of Patient Education on Mirror Therapy to Improve Upper Extremity Function in Acute Stroke Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04542772 naunknown statusnot on this map

Effectiveness of Patient Education on Mirror Therapy to Improve Upper Extremity Function in Acute Stroke Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorHealth Sciences North Research InstituteRan2021 to 2021Enrolled36ConditionsStroke, AcuteArmsMirror Therapy, Regular Rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Venkadesan RajendranHealth Sciences North, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. venkadphysio@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4919-6000
Deepa JeevananthamHealth Sciences North, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Céline LarivièreNortheastern Ontario Stroke Network, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Ravinder-Jeet SinghHealth Sciences North, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Lisa ZemanHealth Sciences North, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Padma PapuriNorthern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Health Sciences North · CAOntario Stroke Network · CA

Funding

Northern Ontario Academic Medicine Association C-20-15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany therapeutic interventions are performed by physiotherapists to improve upper extremity function and/or activities of daily living (ADL) in stroke patients. Mirror therapy (MT) is a simple technique that can be self-administered by the patients with intact cognition following patient education by a skilled physiotherapist. However, the effectiveness of self-administered MT in post-stroke patients in upper extremity function remains unclear. Therefore, the objective of this study is to examine the effectiveness of MT in improving upper extremity function and recovery in acute stroke patients.

methodsThis study is a single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled trial with blinded outcome evaluation (PROBE design), in which a total of 36 eligible acute stroke patients will be randomly assigned to control (n=18) and experimental group (n=18). Participants in the control group will receive regular rehabilitation interventions whereas participants in the experimental group will receive MT education in addition to their regular interventions for 4 weeks. STUDY OUTCOME: The primary outcome measure will be upper extremity function that will be measured using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale and the Wolf Motor Function Test. The secondary outcome measure will be behaviors related to ADL as estimated using the Modified Barthel Index. Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline and at 4 weeks post-rehabilitation intervention/MT.

resultsA two-way repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) with time and group effects will be used to analyze between-group differences. The level of significance will be set at P < 0.05.

conclusionThe results of the study will provide critical information to include self-administered MT as an adjuvant to regular interventions and may facilitate recovery of the upper extremity function of stroke patients.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04542772 . Registered on 9 September 2020. Protocol version: Final 1.0.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationActivities of Daily LivingHumansProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionTreatment OutcomeUpper ExtremityEducationMirror therapyStroke

Identifiers

PMID34243808
PMCPMC8268536
OpenAlexW3179363256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.