SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2021
The effect of fascia iliaca block on postoperative pain and analgesic consumption for patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fascia iliaca compartment block for postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Pooled it
- Timing of suprainguinal fascia iliaca block in hip hemiarthroplasty: impact on QoR-15 scores- a prospective randomized study.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Article
- Review
- Comparison of Dye Spread Pattern and Nerve Involvement between Suprainguinal and Infrainguinal Fascia Iliaca Blocks with Different Injectate Volumes: A Cadaveric Evaluation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Nerve Blocks for Post-Surgical Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Current Research.Journal of pain research · 2024Review
- Peripheral nerve-blocks and associations with length of stay and readmissions in fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2023Observational
- Logistic Regression Analysis of Risk Factors and Improvement of Clinical Treatment of Traumatic Arthritis after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) in the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block versus Infrainguinal Fascia Iliaca Nerve Block for Patients Undergoing Elective Hip Replacement: A Double-blinded, Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial.Local and regional anesthesia · 2022Article
- Regional anesthesia for geriatric population.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, and complications after fascia iliaca block (FIB) versus control for patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Second, we compared the outcomes of FIB versus placebo. Finally, we sought to evaluate pain and analgesic consumption after preoperative and postoperative FIB.
methodsWe performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov , and CENTRAL through February 2021 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of FIB versus control for patients undergoing primary THA. All analyses were conducted on intent-to-treat data with a random-effects model.
resultsTwelve RCTs with a total of 815 patients were included. There was no difference in postoperative pain (P = 0.64), analgesic consumption (P = 0.14), or complication rate (P = 0.99) between FIB and control groups. Moreover, no difference in postoperative pain (P = 0.26), analgesic consumption (P = 0.06), or complication rate (P = 0.71) was found between FIB and placebo. Moreover, sensitivity analysis suggested that no significant difference in postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, or complication rate was present between FIB and control in studies that used preoperative and postoperative FIB.
conclusionFIB was not found to be superior to placebo or various anesthetic techniques for patients undergoing primary THA, as measured by postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, and complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.