Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34243772›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Participant perspectives of a telehealth trial investigating the use of telephone and text message support in obesity management: a qualitative evaluation.

Emily Lewis, Peter Hassmén, Kate L Pumpa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emily LewisUniversity of Canberra Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Building 29, Bruce, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia. Emily.Lewis@canberra.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2893-2913
Peter HassménUniversity of Canberra Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Building 29, Bruce, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia.
Kate L PumpaUniversity of Canberra Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Building 29, Bruce, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuantitative evidence suggests that interventions involving telephone calls and text message are feasible and effective for improving lifestyle intervention adherence and clinical outcomes among adults with obesity. The aim of this article is to provide qualitative insight into the perspectives and experiences of participants who completed a telehealth trial exploring the use of telephone and text support as adjunctive tools to support a community-based obesity management program.

methodsFocus groups were conducted in order to evaluate program acceptability and overall participant perceptions of the clinical trial. Thematic content analysis was used to analyse the data, aided by the development of a thematic network.

resultsThe telehealth trial was well received. Participants found the telephone and text message support highly beneficial, providing encouragement, motivation and accountability via a simple and convenient mode of communication.

conclusionsThese findings suggest a high degree of promise for the incorporation of telephone and text support in obesity management.

Indexed as

Obesity ManagementTelemedicineText MessagingAdultHumansObesityTelephoneAdherenceComplianceFocus groupmHealthObesityQualitative evaluationTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID34243772
PMCPMC8268488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.