Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34243742›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2021

Low mechano-afferent fibers reduce thermal pain but not pain intensity in CRPS.

Kathrin Habig, Gothje Lautenschläger, Hagen Maxeiner, Frank Birklein, Heidrun H Krämer, Susann Seddigh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sensory processing in medically unexplained pain syndrome. A systematic review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kathrin HabigDepartment of Neurology, Justus Liebig University, 35392, Giessen, Germany. Kathrin.Habig@neuro.med.uni-giessen.de.
Gothje LautenschlägerDepartment of Neurology, Justus Liebig University, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Hagen MaxeinerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Justus Liebig University, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Frank BirkleinDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 56101, Mainz, Germany.
Heidrun H Krämer *Department of Neurology, Justus Liebig University, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Susann Seddigh *Department of Neurology, BG Klinikum Duisburg, 47249, Duisburg, Germany.
University of Giessen · DEBG Klinikum Duisburg · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman hairy (not glabrous skin) is equipped with a subgroup of C-fibers, the C-tactile (CT) fibers. Those do not mediate pain but affective aspects of touch. CT-fiber-activation reduces experimental pain if they are intact. In this pilot study we investigated pain modulating capacities of CT-afferents in CRPS.

methods10 CRPS-patients (mean age 33 years, SEM 3.3) and 11 healthy controls (mean age 43.2 years, SEM 3.9) participated. CT-targeted-touch (brush stroking, velocity: 3 cm/s) was applied on hairy and glabrous skin on the affected and contralateral limb. Patients rated pleasantness of CT-targeted-touch (anchors: 1 "not pleasant"-4 "very pleasant") twice daily on 10 days. Pain intensity (NRS: 0 "no pain" - 10 "worst pain imaginable") was assessed before, 0, 30, 60 and 120 min after each CT-stimulation. To assess sensory changes, quantitative-sensory-testing was performed at the beginning and the end of the trial period.

resultsCT-targeted-touch was felt more pleasant on the healthy compared to the affected limb on hairy (p < 0.001) and glabrous skin (p 0.002), independent of allodynia. In contrast to healthy controls patients felt no difference between stimulating glabrous and hairy skin on the affected limb. Thermal pain thresholds increased after CT-stimulation on the affected limb (cold-pain-threshold: p 0.016; heat-pain-threshold: p 0.033).

conclusionsCT-stimulation normalizes thermal pain thresholds but has no effect on the overall pain in CRPS. Therefore, pain modulating properties of CT-fibers might be too weak to alter chronic pain in CRPS. Moreover, CT-fibers appear to lose their ability to mediate pleasant aspects of touch in CRPS.

Indexed as

AdultComplex Regional Pain SyndromesHumansNerve Fibers, UnmyelinatedPainPain ThresholdPilot ProjectsTouch PerceptionAllodyniaCRPSCT afferentsPain modulationPleasantness of touchQST

Identifiers

PMID34243742
PMCPMC8268451
OpenAlexW3178983253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.