ArticleGenomics2021
An evaluation of the species and subspecies of the genus Salmonella with whole genome sequence data: Proposal of type strains and epithets for novel S. enterica subspecies VII, VIII, IX, X and XI.
Article in Genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- A zoonoticInfection and immunity · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Prevalence ofHealth science reports · 2025Review
- Genomic-enabled classification of threeJournal of clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- Genomic diversity of non-typhoidalMicrobial genomics · 2025Article
- Detection of Salmonella from raw cow milk and beef and its antibiotic susceptibility profile in selected districts of the Sidama Regional State, Ethiopia.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Unexpected 16S rRNA heterogeneity in 'International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2025Article
- Identification of inhibitors of the Salmonella FraB deglycase, a drug target.FEBS open bio · 2025Article
- Staphylococcus hominis as a source of antimicrobial peptides: identification of a new peptide with potential antimicrobial properties using in silico approach.Archives of microbiology · 2025Article
- Phylogeny and divergence of the 100 most commonFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Bridging Classical Methodologies inMicroorganisms · 2024Review
- Comprehensive blueprint of Salmonella genomic plasticity identifies hotspots for pathogenicity genes.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Detection and Phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- What's on a prophage: analysis ofmSphere · 2024Article
- Genomic investigation of Salmonella enterica Serovar Welikade from a pediatric diarrhea case first time in Shanghai, China.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Pangenomic analysis identifies correlations betweenMicrobiome research reports · 2024Article
- Notification of bacterial strains made available by the United Kingdom National Collection of Type Cultures in 2022.Access microbiology · 2024Article
- Revised taxonomic classification of theFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Species and subspecies within the Salmonella genus have been defined for public health purposes by biochemical properties; however, reference laboratories have increasingly adopted sequence-based, and especially whole genome sequence (WGS), methods for surveillance and routine identification. This leads to potential disparities in subspecies definitions, routine typing, and the ability to detect novel subspecies. A large-scale analysis of WGS data from the routine sequencing of clinical isolates was employed to define and characterise Salmonella subspecies population structure, demonstrating that the Salmonella species and subspecies were genetically distinct, including those previously identified through phylogenetic approaches, namely: S. enterica subspecies londinensis (VII), subspecies brasiliensis (VIII), subspecies hibernicus (IX) and subspecies essexiensis (X). The analysis also identified an additional novel subspecies, reptilium (XI). Further, these analyses indicated that S. enterica subspecies arizonae (IIIa) isolates were divergent from the other S. enterica subspecies, which clustered together and, on the basis of ANI analysis, subspecies IIIa was sufficiently distinct to be classified as a separate species, S. arizonae. Multiple phylogenetic and statistical approaches generated congruent results, suggesting that the proposed species and subspecies structure was sufficiently biologically robust for routine application. Biochemical analyses demonstrated that not all subspecies were distinguishable by these means and that biochemical approaches did not capture the genomic diversity of the genus. We recommend the adoption of standardised genomic definitions of species and subspecies and a genome sequence-based approach to routine typing for the identification and definition of novel subspecies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.