ArticleBiophysical journal2021
Using FCS to accurately measure protein concentration in the presence of noise and photobleaching.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Receptor-Mediated Shuttling of a D-Amino Acid Peptide Achieves High Nanomolar Cytosolic Concentrations.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Correction of Background in Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy for Accurate Determination of Particle Number.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Both the transcriptional activator, Bcd, and repressor, Cic, form small mobile oligomeric clusters.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative cell biology requires precise and accurate concentration measurements, resolved both in space and time. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) has been held as a promising technique to perform such measurements because the fluorescence fluctuations it relies on are directly dependent on the absolute number of fluorophores in the detection volume. However, the most interesting applications are in cells, where autofluorescence and confinement result in strong background noise and important levels of photobleaching. Both noise and photobleaching introduce systematic bias in FCS concentration measurements and need to be corrected for. Here, we propose to make use of the photobleaching inevitably occurring in confined environments to perform series of FCS measurements at different fluorophore concentration, which we show allows a precise in situ measurement of both background noise and molecular brightness. Such a measurement can then be used as a calibration to transform confocal intensity images into concentration maps. The power of this approach is first illustrated with in vitro measurements using different dye solutions, then its applicability for in vivo measurements is demonstrated in Drosophila embryos for a model nuclear protein and for two morphogens, Bicoid and Capicua.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.