Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34242588›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2021

Quantifying the impact of electric fields on single-cell motility.

Thomas P Prescott, Kan Zhu, Min Zhao, Ruth E Baker

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Computational models in directed cell migration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Galvanotactic directionality of cell groups depends on group size.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Thomas P PrescottWolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: tprescott@turing.ac.uk.
Kan ZhuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Department of Dermatology, Institute for Regenerative Cures, University of California, Sacramento, California.
Min ZhaoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Department of Dermatology, Institute for Regenerative Cures, University of California, Sacramento, California.
Ruth E BakerWolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine · USTuring Institute · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Molecular Generators at Corneal Wounds Produce and regulate the Wound Electrical SignalsR01EY019101 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ZHAO, MIN · 2010 to 2023
$5.2M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R000816/1NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell motility in response to environmental cues forms the basis of many developmental processes in multicellular organisms. One such environmental cue is an electric field (EF), which induces a form of motility known as electrotaxis. Electrotaxis has evolved in a number of cell types to guide wound healing and has been associated with different cellular processes, suggesting that observed electrotactic behavior is likely a combination of multiple distinct effects arising from the presence of an EF. To determine the different mechanisms by which observed electrotactic behavior emerges, and thus to design EFs that can be applied to direct and control electrotaxis, researchers require accurate quantitative predictions of cellular responses to externally applied fields. Here, we use mathematical modeling to formulate and parameterize a variety of hypothetical descriptions of how cell motility may change in response to an EF. We calibrate our model to observed data using synthetic likelihoods and Bayesian sequential learning techniques and demonstrate that EFs bias cellular motility through only one of a selection of hypothetical mechanisms. We also demonstrate how the model allows us to make predictions about cellular motility under different EFs. The resulting model and calibration methodology will thus form the basis for future data-driven and model-based feedback control strategies based on electric actuation.

Indexed as

ElectricityWound HealingBayes TheoremCell MovementElectric Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID34242588
PMCPMC8391084
OpenAlexW3178724149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.