ArticleThe New phytologist2022
Contrasting effects of soil microbial interactions on growth-defence relationships between early- and mid-successional plant communities.
Article in The New phytologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Soil Microbiome Predator Diversity Outperforms Nitrogen Addition in Boosting Plant Biomass via Bacterial Community Shifts.Global change biology · 2026Article
- Responses of soil bacterial composition and network complexity to OFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Article
- Cinnamaldehyde as a dietary modulator of gut microbiota and growth in broilers under low-protein feeding conditions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effect of continuous cropping on bacterial and fungal communities in Glehnia littoralis soil.Folia microbiologica · 2025Article
- Beyond correlation: Understanding the causal link between microbiome and plant health.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Rhizobia-legume symbiosis mediates direct and indirect interactions between plants, herbivores and their parasitoids.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Metagenomic insights into inhibition of soil microbial carbon metabolism by phosphorus limitation during vegetation succession.ISME communications · 2024Article
- Adaptation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Vegetation-environment interactions: plant species distribution and community assembly in mixed coniferous forests of Northwestern Himalayas.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Changes in nitrogen and phosphorus availability driven by secondary succession in temperate forests shape soil fungal communities and function.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Soil fungal communities show more specificity than bacteria for plant species composition in a temperate forest in China.BMC microbiology · 2022Article
- Harnessing belowground processes for sustainable intensification of agricultural systems.Plant and soil · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plants allocate resources to processes related to growth and enemy defence. Simultaneously, they interact with complex soil microbiomes that also affect plant performance. While the influence of individual microbial groups on single plants is increasingly studied, effects of microbial interactions on growth, defence and growth-defence relationships remain unknown, especially at the plant community level. We investigated how three microbial groups (bacteria, fungi, protists), alone and in full-factorial combinations, affect plant performance and potential growth-defence relationships by measuring phenolics composition in early- and mid-successional grass and forb communities in a glasshouse experiment. Microbial groups did not affect plant growth and only fungi increased defence compounds in early- and mid-successional forbs, while grasses were not affected. Shoot biomass-defence relationships were negatively correlated in most microbial treatments in early-successional forbs, but positively in several microbial treatments in mid-successional forbs. The growth-defence relationship was generally negative in early-successional but not in mid-successional grasses. The presence of different microbiomes commonly removed the observed growth-defence relationships. We conclude that soil microorganisms and their interactions can shift growth-defence relationships differentially for plant functional groups and the relationships vary between successional stages. Microbial interaction-induced growth-defence shifts might therefore underlie distinct plant strategies and fitness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.