Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34242360›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Electrophysiological priming effects demonstrate independence and overlap of visual regularity representations in the extrastriate cortex.

Alexis D J Makin, John Tyson-Carr, Yiovanna Derpsch, Giulia Rampone, Marco Bertamini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexis D J MakinDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4490-7400
John Tyson-CarrDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Yiovanna DerpschDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Giulia RamponeDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Marco BertaminiDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8617-6864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An Event Related Potential (ERP) component called the Sustained Posterior Negativity (SPN) is generated by regular visual patterns (e.g. vertical reflectional symmetry, horizontal reflectional symmetry or rotational symmetry). Behavioural studies suggest symmetry becomes increasingly salient when the exemplars update rapidly. In line with this, Experiment 1 (N = 48) found that SPN amplitude increased when three different reflectional symmetry patterns were presented sequentially. We call this effect 'SPN priming'. We then exploited SPN priming to investigate independence of different symmetry representations. SPN priming did not survive changes in retinal location (Experiment 2, N = 48) or non-orthogonal changes in axis orientation (Experiment 3, N = 48). However, SPN priming transferred between vertical and horizontal axis orientations (Experiment 4, N = 48) and between reflectional and rotational symmetry (Experiment 5, N = 48). SPN priming is interesting in itself, and a useful new method for identifying functional boundaries of the symmetry response. We conclude that visual regularities at different retinal locations are coded independently. However, there is some overlap between different regularities presented at the same retinal location.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityPattern Recognition, VisualVisual CortexYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34242360
PMCPMC8270198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.