Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34242329›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Screen time and physical activity in children and adolescents aged 10-15 years.

Anna Dahlgren, Linnea Sjöblom, Helén Eke, Stephanie E Bonn, Ylva Trolle Lagerros

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
24.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna DahlgrenClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Linnea SjöblomClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Helén EkeClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stephanie E BonnClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ylva Trolle LagerrosClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6816-7577
Karolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious research studies have demonstrated a relationship between low levels of physical activity and high amounts of screen time in children and adolescents. However, this is usually based on self-reported data. Therefore, the aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the association between objectively measured smartphone screen time and physical activity among children and adolescents aged 10-15 years.

methodsDuring seven consecutive days, we objectively assessed smartphone screen time, using the SCRIIN smartphone application, and physical activity, using the SCRIIN activity tracker, in children and adolescents recruited from two schools in Stockholm County, Sweden. Moreover, the children/adolescents and their parents responded to a questionnaire, obtaining among other things: self-reported screen time, physical activity, sleep and health-related quality of life.

resultsA total of 121 children and adolescents (mean age: 12.1 ± 1.5) were included in the study. Objectively measured smartphone screen time was 161.2 ± 81.1 min/day. Mean physical activity, measured with the SCRIIN activity tracker, was 32.6 ± 16.5 active min/day. Minutes of screen time and physical activity did not differ between the children and adolescents from the two schools, despite located in different socioeconomic areas. Further, we found no association between smartphone screen time and physical activity. However, girls aged 14-15 years, had more smartphone screen time (p<0.01) and were significantly more physically active (p<0.01) than girls aged 10-12 years. In addition, boys reported more than five times more time spent on computer and video games than girls did.

conclusionSmartphone screen time was not associated with physical activity level among children and adolescents aged 10-15 years.

Indexed as

Screen TimeSmartphoneAdolescentBody Mass IndexChildExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMobile ApplicationsSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenVideo Games

Identifiers

PMID34242329
PMCPMC8270173
OpenAlexW3178193710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.