Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34242319›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2021

Anxiety and depression among people living in quarantine centers during COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method study from western Nepal.

Udaya Bahadur B C, Sunil Pokharel, Sabika Munikar, Chetan Nidhi Wagle, Pratik Adhikary, Brish Bahadur Shahi, Chandra Thapa, Ram Prasad Bhandari, Bipin Adhikari, Kanchan Thapa

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Management of COVID-19 and vaccination in Nepal: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Covid-19 stigmatization: A systematic literature review.Journal of public health research · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Udaya Bahadur B CPublic Health Service Office Surkhet, Ministry of Social Development, Karnali Province, Birendranagar, Nepal.
Sunil PokharelCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sabika MunikarPost Basic Nursing Science Faculty, Om Health Campus, Purbanchal University, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-6347-8285
Chetan Nidhi WaglePublic Health Service Office Surkhet, Ministry of Social Development, Karnali Province, Birendranagar, Nepal.
Pratik AdhikarySchool of Public Health, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Brish Bahadur ShahiHealth Division, Ministry of Social Development, Karnali Province, Birendranagar, Nepal.
Chandra ThapaSavitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Ram Prasad BhandariProvince Hospital, Ministry of Social Development, Karnali Province, Birendranagar, Nepal.
Bipin AdhikariCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8981-3910
Kanchan ThapaCentral Department of Population Studies, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-2698-3506
Mahidol University · THBerkeley Public Health Division · USPurbanchal University · NPSavitribai Phule Pune University · INTribhuvan University · NPUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn response to the COVID-19 pandemic, incoming travelers were quarantined at specific centers in Nepal and major checkpoints in Nepal-India border. Nepal adopted a generic public health approaches to control and quarantine returnee migrants, with little attention towards the quality of quarantine facilities and its aftermath, such as the poor mental health of the returnee migrants. The main objective of this study was to explore the status of anxiety and depression, and factors affecting them among returnee migrants living in institutional quarantine centers of western Nepal.

methodsA mixed method approach in this study included a quantitative survey and in-depth interviews (IDIs) among respondents in quarantine centers of Karnali province between 21st April and 15th May 2020. Survey questionnaire utilized Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) tools, which were administered among 441 quarantined returnee migrants. IDIs were conducted among 12 participants which included a mix of six quarantined migrants and healthcare workers each from the quarantine centres. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted on quantitative data; and thematic analysis was utilized for qualitative data.

resultsMild depression (9.1%; 40/441) and anxiety (16.1%; 71/441) was common among respondents followed by moderate depression and anxiety {depression (3.4%; 15/441), anxiety (4.1%; 18/441)} and severe depression and anxiety {depression (1.1%; 5/441), anxiety (0.7%; 3/441)}. Anxiety and depression were independent of their socio-demographic characteristics. Perceived fear of contracting COVID-19, severity and death were prominent among the respondents. Respondents experienced stigma and discrimination in addition to being at the risk of disease and possible loss of employment and financial responsibilities. In addition, poor (quality and access to) health services, and poor living condition at the quarantine centres adversely affected respondents' mental health.

conclusionDepression and anxiety were high among quarantined population and warrants more research. Institutional quarantine centers of Karnali province of Nepal were in poor conditions which adversely impacted mental health of the respondents. Poor resource allocation for health, hygiene and living conditions can be counterproductive to the population quarantined.

Indexed as

COVID-19QuarantineSARS-CoV-2AdolescentAdultAgedAnxietyChildDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNepal

Identifiers

PMID34242319
PMCPMC8270129
OpenAlexW3178008869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.