ArticlePloS one2021
Development and analytical validation of a novel bioavailable 25-hydroxyvitamin D assay.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic correlates of vitamin D-binding protein and 25-hydroxyvitamin D in neonatal dried blood spots.Nature communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBioavailable 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) may be a better indicator of vitamin D sufficiency than total 25OHD. This report describes a novel assay for measuring serum bioavailable 25OHD.
methodsWe developed an assay for 25OHD % bioavailability based on competitive binding of 25OHD tracer between vitamin D-binding protein (DBP)-coated affinity chromatography beads and serum DBP. Bioavailable 25OHD, total 25OHD, albumin, and DBP protein concentrations were measured in 89 samples from hospitalized patients and 42 healthy controls to determine how the DBP binding assay responds to differences in concentrations of DBP and compares to calculated bioavailable 25OHD values.
resultsDBP binding assay showed a linear relationship between DBP-bound 25OHD tracer recovered from bead supernatant and DBP calibrator concentrations (y = 0.0017x +0.731, R2 = 0.9961, p<0.001). Inversion of this relationship allowed interpolation of DBP binding equivalents based upon 25OHD tracer recovered. The relationship between DBP binding equivalents and % bioavailability fits a non-linear curve, allowing calculation of % bioavailable 25OHD from DBP binding equivalents (y = 10.625x-0.817, R2 = 0.9961, p<0.001). In hospitalized patient samples, there were linear relationships between DBP protein concentrations and DBP binding equivalents (y = 0.7905x + 59.82, R2 = 0.8597, p<0.001), between measured vs. calculated % bioavailability (y = 0.9528 + 0.0357, R2 = 0.7200, p<0.001), and between absolute concentrations of measured vs. calculated bioavailable 25OHD (y = 1.2403 + 0.1221, R2 = 0.8913, p<0.001).
conclusionsThe DBP-binding assay for bioavailable 25OHD shows expected changes in 25OHD % bioavailability in response to changes in DBP concentrations and concordance with calculated bioavailable 25OHD concentrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.