Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34242260›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Variation of virulence of five Aspergillus fumigatus isolates in four different infection models.

E M Keizer, I D Valdes, G Forn-Cuni, E Klijn, A H Meijer, F Hillman, H A B Wösten, H de Cock

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Novel Insights intoJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

E M KeizerMicrobiology, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
I D ValdesMicrobiology, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6584-5715
G Forn-CuniInstitute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5976-4759
E KlijnMicrobiology, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5304-1258
A H MeijerInstitute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1325-0725
F HillmanJunior Research Group Evolution of Microbial Interactions, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, Hans Knöll Institute (HKI), Jena, Germany.
H A B WöstenMicrobiology, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
H de CockMicrobiology, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8420-6764
Utrecht University · NLLeiden University · NLLeibniz-Institut für Naturstoff-Forschung und Infektionsbiologie e. V. - Hans-Knöll-Institut (HKI) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conidia of Aspergillus fumigatus are inhaled by humans on daily basis. As a consequence, these conidia can cause infections that differ in severity ranging from allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis to invasive aspergillosis. In this study we compared virulence of five A. fumigatus isolates in four different infection models to address the predictive value of different model systems. Two of the A. fumigatus strains were isolated from dogs with a non-invasive sino-nasal aspergillosis (DTO271-B5 and DTO303-F3), while three strains were isolated from human patients with invasive aspergillosis (Af293, ATCC46645 and CEA10). Infection models used encompassed cultured type II A549 lung epithelial cells, Protostelium aurantium amoeba, Galleria melonella larvae and zebrafish embryos. No major differences in virulence between these five strains were observed in the lung epithelial cell model. In contrast, strain ATCC46645 was most virulent in the amoeba and zebrafish model, whereas it was much less virulent in the Galleria infection model. DTO303-F3 was most virulent in the latter model. In general, reference strain Af293 was less virulent as compared to the other strains. Genome sequence analysis showed that this latter strain differed from the other four strains in 136 SNPs in virulence-related genes. Together, our results show that virulence of individual A. fumigatus strains show significant differences between infection models. We conclude that the predictive value of different model systems varies since the relative virulence across fungal strains does not hold up across different infection model systems.

Indexed as

Aspergillus fumigatusDisease Models, AnimalZebrafishA549 CellsAnimalsAspergillosisDogsHumansVirulence

Identifiers

PMID34242260
PMCPMC8270121
OpenAlexW3178797919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.