Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34242212›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Measuring threshold and latency of motion perception on a swinging bed.

Maxime Guyon, Cyrielle Chea, Davy Laroche, Isabelle Fournel, Audrey Baudet, Michel Toupet, Alexis Bozorg Grayeli

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02851524 (Proof of Concept Study Concerning Vestibular Stimulation Using a New Method of Dynamic Posturography.), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02851524 nacompletednot on this map

Proof of Concept Study Concerning Vestibular Stimulation Using a New Method of Dynamic Posturography.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonRan2016 to 2017Enrolled30ConditionsVestibular StimulationArmsposturography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maxime GuyonOtolaryngology Department, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Cyrielle CheaOtolaryngology Department, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5648-7805
Davy LarocheINSERM CIC 1432, Plateforme d'Investigation Technologique, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Isabelle FournelINSERM CIC 1432, Module Epidémiologie Clinique/Essais Cliniques, Dijon, France.
Audrey BaudetINSERM CIC 1432, Plateforme d'Investigation Technologique, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Michel ToupetOtolaryngology Department, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Alexis Bozorg GrayeliOtolaryngology Department, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4353-9431

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOur objective was to develop and to evaluate a system to measure latency and threshold of pendular motion perception based on a swinging bed. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective study included 30 healthy adults (age: 32 ± 12 years). All subjects were tested twice with a 10 min. interval. A second trial was conducted 2 to 15 days after. A rehabilitation swinging bed was connected to an electronic device emitting a beep at the beginning of each oscillation phase with an adjustable time lag. Subjects were blindfolded and auditory cues other than the beep were minimized. The acceleration threshold was measured by letting the bed oscillate freely until a natural break and asking the patient when he did not perceive any motion. The perception latency was determined by asking the patient to indicate whether the beep and the peak of each oscillation were synchronous. The time lag between sound and peak of the head position was swept from -750 to +750 ms by 50 ms increments.

resultsThe mean acceleration threshold was 9.2±4.60 cm/s2. The range width of the synchronous perception interval was estimated as 535±190 ms. The point of subjective synchronicity defined as the center of this interval was -195±106 ms (n = 30). The test-retest evaluation in the same trial showed an acceptable reproducibility for the acceleration threshold and good to excellent for all parameters related to sound-movement latency.

conclusionSwinging bed combined to sound stimulation can provide reproducible information on movement perception in a simple and non-invasive manner with highly reproducible results.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultBedsFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34242212
PMCPMC8270192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.