ReviewAnnual review of vision science2021
Visual Remapping.
Review in Annual review of vision science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-saccadic disruption of semantic category information in naturalistic scenes.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2026Article
- Actions as perceptual experiments.Journal of vision · 2026Review
- Top-down motivation both decreases and increases feature interference following a saccade.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Predictive remapping and allocentric coding as consequences of energy efficiency in recurrent neural network models of active vision.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Serial dependence is stronger for peripheral than for central vision.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Saccade-related LFP power transients in the primate amygdala and hippocampus linked to the perception of social status.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Presaccadic modulation of lateral interactions.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- From the eye to the world: Spatial suppression is primarily coded in retinotopic coordinates but can be learned in spatiotopic coordinates.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Article
- Spatiotemporal predictability of saccades modulates postsaccadic feature interference.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Post-Saccadic Disruption of Semantic Category Information in Naturalistic Scenes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Grouping signals in primate visual cortex.Neuron · 2025Article
- Presaccadic attentional shifts are not modulated by saccade amplitude.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Forward and convergent remapping of receptive fields from local field potentials in frontal eye fields.Communications biology · 2025Article
- The influence of saccade target status on the reference frame of object-location binding.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2025Article
- Building egocentric models of local space from retinal input.Current biology : CB · 2024Review
- Widespread receptive field remapping in early primate visual cortex.Cell reports · 2024Article
- Compression of time in double-step saccades.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Feature-selective responses in macaque visual cortex follow eye movements during natural vision.Nature neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our visual system is fundamentally retinotopic. When viewing a stable scene, each eye movement shifts object features and locations on the retina. Thus, sensory representations must be updated, or remapped, across saccades to align presaccadic and postsaccadic inputs. The earliest remapping studies focused on anticipatory, presaccadic shifts of neuronal spatial receptive fields. Over time, it has become clear that there are multiple forms of remapping and that different forms of remapping may be mediated by different neural mechanisms. This review attempts to organize the various forms of remapping into a functional taxonomy based on experimental data and ongoing debates about forward versus convergent remapping, presaccadic versus postsaccadic remapping, and spatial versus attentional remapping. We integrate findings from primate neurophysiological, human neuroimaging and behavioral, and computational modeling studies. We conclude by discussing persistent open questions related to remapping, with specific attention to binding of spatial and featural information during remapping and speculations about remapping's functional significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.