Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34241789›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2021

Research Goal-Driven Data Model and Harmonization for De-Identifying Patient Data in Radiomics.

Surajit Kundu, Santam Chakraborty, Jayanta Mukhopadhyay, Syamantak Das, Sanjoy Chatterjee, Rimpa Basu Achari, Indranil Mallick, Partha Pratim Das, Moses Arunsingh, Tapesh Bhattacharyya and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Surajit KunduIndian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, India. surajit.113125@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6580-5163
Santam ChakrabortyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, 14 MAR (E-W), Kolkata, 700160, India.
Jayanta MukhopadhyayIndian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, India.
Syamantak DasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, 14 MAR (E-W), Kolkata, 700160, India.
Sanjoy ChatterjeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, 14 MAR (E-W), Kolkata, 700160, India.
Rimpa Basu AchariDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, 14 MAR (E-W), Kolkata, 700160, India.
Indranil MallickDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, 14 MAR (E-W), Kolkata, 700160, India.
Partha Pratim DasIndian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, India.
Moses ArunsinghDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, 14 MAR (E-W), Kolkata, 700160, India.
Tapesh BhattacharyyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, 14 MAR (E-W), Kolkata, 700160, India.
Soumendranath RayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, 14 MAR (E-W), Kolkata, 700160, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are various efforts in de-identifying patient's radiation oncology data for their uses in the advancement of research in medicine. Though the task of de-identification needs to be defined in the context of research goals and objectives, existing systems lack the flexibility of modeling data and normalization of names of attributes for accomplishing them. In this work, we describe a de-identification process of radiation and clinical oncology data, which is guided by a data model and a schema of dynamically capturing domain ontology and normalization of terminologies, defined in tune with the research goals in this area. The radiological images are obtained in DICOM format. It consists of diagnostic, radiation therapy (RT) treatment planning, RT verification, and RT response images. During the DICOM de-identification, a few crucial pieces of information are taken about the dataset. The proposed model is generic in organizing information modeling in sync with the de-identification of a patient's clinical information. The treatment and clinical data are provided in the comma-separated values (CSV) format, which follows a predefined data structure. The de-identified data is harmonized throughout the entire process. We have presented four specific case studies on four different types of cancers, namely glioblastoma multiforme, head-neck, breast, and lung. We also present experimental validation on a few patients' data in these four areas. A few aspects are taken care of during de-identification, such as preservation of longitudinal date changes (LDC), incremental de-identification, referential data integrity between the clinical and image data, de-identified data harmonization, and transformation of the data to an underlined database schema.

Indexed as

GoalsRadiologyDatabases, FactualHumansModels, TheoreticalDe-identificationDICOMGlioblastomaHarmonizationHead–neck cancerLongitudinal Date Changes (LDC)NormalizationPatient Health Record (PHR)Protected Health Information (PHI)RadiologyRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID34241789
PMCPMC8455753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.