Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34241788›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2022

Lower Utilization of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Vegetarians, Adventist Health Study-2.

Jisoo Oh, Keiji Oda, Yermek Ibrayev, Wenes P Reis, Gary E Fraser, Michael J Orlich, Synnove F Knutsen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jisoo OhSchool of Public Health, Loma Linda University, 24951 North Circle Drive, Nichol Hall #2008, Loma Linda, CA, 92350, USA. jboh@llu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8905-7633
Keiji OdaSchool of Public Health, Loma Linda University, 24951 North Circle Drive, Nichol Hall #2008, Loma Linda, CA, 92350, USA.
Yermek IbrayevSchool of Public Health, Loma Linda University, 24951 North Circle Drive, Nichol Hall #2008, Loma Linda, CA, 92350, USA.
Wenes P ReisSchool of Public Health, Loma Linda University, 24951 North Circle Drive, Nichol Hall #2008, Loma Linda, CA, 92350, USA.
Gary E FraserSchool of Public Health, Loma Linda University, 24951 North Circle Drive, Nichol Hall #2008, Loma Linda, CA, 92350, USA.
Michael J OrlichSchool of Public Health, Loma Linda University, 24951 North Circle Drive, Nichol Hall #2008, Loma Linda, CA, 92350, USA.
Synnove F KnutsenSchool of Public Health, Loma Linda University, 24951 North Circle Drive, Nichol Hall #2008, Loma Linda, CA, 92350, USA.
Loma Linda University · US

Funding

Plant-based diets and risk of cancerU01CA152939 · NCI · LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY · PI FRASER, GARY E. · 2011 to 2015
$5.7M
Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute 1U01CA152939-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to examine lifestyle predictors of the utilization of colorectal cancer screening. Using modified Poisson regression, we studied self-reported colorectal cancer screening utilization (colonoscopy or fecal occult blood test) with various dietary and lifestyle characteristics among 33,922 subjects aged 51 + years in the Adventist Health Study-2, a large population-based prospective cohort study. According to the multivariable-adjusted models, vegetarians were less likely to report screening: vegans, prevalence ratio (PR) = 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.77-0.83); lacto-ovo-vegetarians (0.95 [0.93-0.97]); and semi-vegetarians (0.97 [0.94-0.99]) compared to non-vegetarians. Blacks were more likely than non-Blacks to be screened (1.04 [1.02-1.06]) and males were less likely (0.93 [0.92-0.95]) to utilize the screening tests. Older subjects were more likely to be screened, and unmarried and divorced/widowed subjects were less likely to screen. Education, personal income, and BMI were positively associated with screening, with p-value for trend < 0.001 for all three variables. A family history of colorectal cancer was associated with higher screening prevalence (1.15 [1.12-1.17]). Our stratified analyses on race and gender with dietary patterns showed non-Hispanic White vegans (PR = 0.77 [0.74-0.81]) and male vegans (PR = 0.76 [0.72-0.81]) were least likely compliant with colorectal cancer screening (p = 0.009 and p = 0.04, respectively). Vegans may believe that their personal risk for colorectal cancer is low due to their healthy lifestyle, resulting in lack of compliance to colorectal cancer screening. It remains to be seen whether vegans in AHS-2 also experience higher incidence of colorectal cancer or are diagnosed at a later stage.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsDiet, VegetarianEarly Detection of CancerHumansMaleProspective StudiesVegetariansColonoscopyColorectal cancer screeningDietary patternsFecal occult blood testVegetarian

Identifiers

PMID34241788
OpenAlexW3179835988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.