Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34241768›Full record

Trial reportJournal of occupational rehabilitation2022

First Contact Practitioners' (FCPs) and General Practitioners' Perceptions Towards FCPs Delivering Vocational Advice to Patients with Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Qualitative Investigation of the Implementation Potential of the I-SWAP Initiative.

Benjamin Saunders, Nadine E Foster, Jonathan C Hill, Gail Sowden, Nicola Evans, Annette Bishop, Siobhan Stynes, Krysia Dziedzic, Laura Campbell, Gabrielle Rankin and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Benjamin SaundersPrimary Care Centre of Excellence Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK. b.saunders@keele.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0856-1596
Nadine E FosterPrimary Care Centre of Excellence Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Jonathan C HillPrimary Care Centre of Excellence Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Gail SowdenPrimary Care Centre of Excellence Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Nicola EvansPrimary Care Centre of Excellence Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Annette BishopPrimary Care Centre of Excellence Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Siobhan StynesPrimary Care Centre of Excellence Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Krysia DziedzicPrimary Care Centre of Excellence Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Laura CampbellPrimary Care Centre of Excellence Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Gabrielle RankinChartered Society of Physiotherapy (CSP), London, UK.
Paula SalmonMid Cheshire Hospital Foundation Trust, Leighton Hospital, Crewe, UK.
Gwenllian Wynne-JonesPrimary Care Centre of Excellence Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain is a common cause of work absence. The recent SWAP (Study of Work And Pain) randomised controlled trial (RCT) found that a brief vocational advice service for primary care patients with MSK pain led to fewer days' work absence and provided good return-on-investment. The I-SWAP (Implementation of the Study of Work And Pain) initiative aimed to deliver an implementation test-bed of the SWAP vocational advice intervention with First Contact Practitioners (FCP). This entailed adapting the SWAP vocational advice training to fit the FCP role. This qualitative investigation explored the implementation potential of FCPs delivering vocational advice for patients with MSK pain. Methods Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with 10 FCPs and 5 GPs. Data were analysed thematically and findings explored using Normalisation Process Theory (NPT). Results I-SWAP achieved a degree of 'coherence' (i.e. made sense), with both FCPs and GPs feeling FCPs were well-placed to discuss work issues with these patients. However, for many of the FCPs, addressing or modifying psychosocial and occupational barriers to return-to-work was not considered feasible within FCP consultations, and improving physical function was prioritised. Concerns were also raised that employers would not act on FCPs' recommendations regarding return-to-work. Conclusion FCPs appear well-placed to discuss work issues with MSK patients, and signpost/refer to other services; however, because they often only see patients once they are less suited to deliver other aspects of vocational advice. Future research is needed to explore how best to provide vocational advice in primary care settings.

Indexed as

General PractitionersMusculoskeletal PainHumansReferral and ConsultationVocational GuidanceImplementation scienceMusculoskeletal painPhysical therapistsPrimary health careWork

Identifiers

PMID34241768
PMCPMC8858917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.