ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2022
A Doppler ultrasound self-monitoring approach for detection of relevant individual decompression stress in scuba diving.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Commentary: Comparison of newer hand-held ultrasound devices for post-dive venous gas emboli quantification to standard echocardiography.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Diver bubble self-monitoring with audio Doppler echography: a way to know own response to dive.Internal and emergency medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Observing modern decompression protocols alone cannot fully prevent diving injuries especially in repetitive diving. Professional audio Doppler bubble measurements are not available to sports scuba divers. If those non-professionals were able to learn audio Doppler self-assessment for bubble grading, such skill could provide significant information on individual decisions with respect to diving safety. We taught audio Doppler self-assessment of subclavian and precordial probe position to 41 divers in a 45-min standardized, didactically optimized training. Assessment before and after air dives within sports diving limits was made through 684 audio Doppler measurements in dive-site conditions by both trained divers and a medical professional, plus additional 2D-echocardiography reference. In all dives (average maximum depth 22 m; dive time 44 min), 33% of all echocardiography measurements revealed bubbles. The specificity of audio bubble detection in combination of both detection sites was 95%, and sensitivity over all grades was 40%, increasing with higher bubble grades. Dive-site audio-Doppler-grading underestimated echo-derived bubble grades. Bubble detection sensitivity of audio Doppler self-assessments, compared to an experienced examiner, was 62% at subclavian and 73% at precordial position. 6 months after the training and 4.5 months after the last measurement, the achieved Doppler skill level remained stable. Audio Doppler self-assessment can be learned by non-professionals in a single teaching intervention. Despite accurate bubble grading is impossible in dive-site conditions, relevant high bubble grades can be detected by non-professionals. This qualitative information can be important in self-evaluating decompression stress and assessing measures for increased diving safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.