Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34241748›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Prognostic Nomograms Based on Three Lymph Node Classification Systems for Resected Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study and External Validation.

Keying Che, Yue Wang, Nandie Wu, Qin Liu, Ju Yang, Baorui Liu, Jia Wei

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Keying CheThe Comprehensive Cancer Centre of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School & Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Yue WangThe Comprehensive Cancer Centre of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School & Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Nandie WuThe Comprehensive Cancer Centre of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School & Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Qin LiuThe Comprehensive Cancer Centre of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School & Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Ju YangThe Comprehensive Cancer Centre of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School & Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Baorui LiuThe Comprehensive Cancer Centre of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School & Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Jia WeiThe Comprehensive Cancer Centre of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School & Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China. jiawei99@nju.edu.cn.

Funding

Distinguished Young Scholars of Jiangsu Province BK20190001The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 14380497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundsThe optimal lymph node classification system for prognostic assessment in gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) patients who undergo lymph node dissection remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to compare prognostic nomograms based on AJCC N stage, lymph node ratio (LNR), and log odds of metastatic lymph nodes (LODDS) to evaluate the prognosis and differentiate risk subgroups of patients with resected GAC. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe collected 4633 patients with resected stage I-III GAC receiving chemotherapy from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. Independent prognostic factors were selected by Cox regression analyses, based on which nomograms were constructed. External validation was performed in 228 cases from Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to evaluate the effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for different lymph node classifications.

resultsMultivariate analysis indicated that age, grade, primary site, T stage, N stage, LNR, LODDS, and radiotherapy were independent predictors. Good discrimination power and high consistency of calibration plots were obtained from the LODDS system nomogram. The LODDS classification could more precisely differentiate risk subgroups and improve the discrimination of the resected GAC prognosis. A user-friendly webserver of LODDS system was built based on the nomogram for convenient clinical application.

conclusionsThe LODDS seems to be the most reliable lymph node classification in predicting the prognosis of patients with resected GAC and should be recommended in clinical prognostic assessment. Incorporating LODDS into the staging system will enable clinicians to more accurately predict prognosis and guide radiotherapy regimen decisions.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaNomogramsCohort StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.