ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021
Prognostic Nomograms Based on Three Lymph Node Classification Systems for Resected Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study and External Validation.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Log odds of positive lymph nodes as a novel prognostic predictor for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Log odds of positive lymph nodes as a novel prognostic predictor for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2022Pooled it
- The prognostic value of log odds of positive lymph nodes in patients with resectable locally advanced gastric cancer following neoadjuvant therapy: results from the SEER database.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Historical evolution and current research status of lymph node staging in gastric cancer: a review.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Evaluation of different lymph node classification systems as independent prognosticators in gastric signet ring cell carcinoma.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of a novel nomogram based on the log odds of positive lymph nodes to predict cancer-specific survival in elderly patients with gastric adenocarcinoma after radical surgery.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Machine learning models based on log odds of positive lymph nodes for predicting survival in TFrontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of novel nomograms based on the log odds of positive lymph nodes to predict the prognosis of papillary thyroid cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Advances in molecular imaging and targeted therapeutics for lymph node metastasis in cancer: a comprehensive review.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Review
- Updated systematic review and meta‑analysis for risk predictors of 30‑day unplanned readmission following gastric cancer surgery.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Prognostic significance of an innovative staging system based on the logarithmic odds of positive lymph nodes for resectable gastroesophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a population-based study with external validation of data.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Comparison of the predictive performance of three lymph node staging systems for late-onset gastric cancer patients after surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- What determines complications and prognosis among patients subject to multivisceral resections for locally advanced gastric cancer?Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- A prognostic model of patients with ovarian mucinous adenocarcinoma: a population-based analysis.Journal of ovarian research · 2022Article
- Comparison of Four Lymph Node Staging Systems in Gastric Adenocarcinoma after Neoadjuvant Therapy - A Population-Based Study.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundsThe optimal lymph node classification system for prognostic assessment in gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) patients who undergo lymph node dissection remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to compare prognostic nomograms based on AJCC N stage, lymph node ratio (LNR), and log odds of metastatic lymph nodes (LODDS) to evaluate the prognosis and differentiate risk subgroups of patients with resected GAC. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe collected 4633 patients with resected stage I-III GAC receiving chemotherapy from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. Independent prognostic factors were selected by Cox regression analyses, based on which nomograms were constructed. External validation was performed in 228 cases from Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to evaluate the effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for different lymph node classifications.
resultsMultivariate analysis indicated that age, grade, primary site, T stage, N stage, LNR, LODDS, and radiotherapy were independent predictors. Good discrimination power and high consistency of calibration plots were obtained from the LODDS system nomogram. The LODDS classification could more precisely differentiate risk subgroups and improve the discrimination of the resected GAC prognosis. A user-friendly webserver of LODDS system was built based on the nomogram for convenient clinical application.
conclusionsThe LODDS seems to be the most reliable lymph node classification in predicting the prognosis of patients with resected GAC and should be recommended in clinical prognostic assessment. Incorporating LODDS into the staging system will enable clinicians to more accurately predict prognosis and guide radiotherapy regimen decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34241748What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.