Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34241719›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2021

Characteristic endoscopic findings of gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic-gland mucosa type.

Kentaro Imamura, Kenshi Yao, Satoshi Nimura, Hiroshi Tanabe, Takao Kanemitsu, Masaki Miyaoka, Yoichiro Ono, Toshiharu Ueki, Akinori Iwashita

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type: A review of the literature.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Review
  18. Numerous lesions of gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic-gland and fundic gland-mucosa type in a patient.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kentaro ImamuraDepartment of Endoscopy, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, 1-1-1 Zokumyoin, Chikushino City, Fukuoka, 818-8502, Japan.
Kenshi YaoDepartment of Endoscopy, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, 1-1-1 Zokumyoin, Chikushino City, Fukuoka, 818-8502, Japan. yao@fukuoka-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0863-3649
Satoshi NimuraDepartment of Pathology, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Chikusino, Japan.
Hiroshi TanabeDepartment of Pathology, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Chikusino, Japan.
Takao KanemitsuDepartment of Endoscopy, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, 1-1-1 Zokumyoin, Chikushino City, Fukuoka, 818-8502, Japan.
Masaki MiyaokaDepartment of Endoscopy, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, 1-1-1 Zokumyoin, Chikushino City, Fukuoka, 818-8502, Japan.
Yoichiro OnoDepartment of Endoscopy, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, 1-1-1 Zokumyoin, Chikushino City, Fukuoka, 818-8502, Japan.
Toshiharu UekiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Chikusino, Japan.
Akinori IwashitaDepartment of Pathology, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Chikusino, Japan.
Fukuoka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY

aimsGastric adenocarcinoma of fundic-gland type (GA-FG) was first proposed as a new entity of gastric adenocarcinoma in 2010. Subsequently, gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic-gland mucosa type (GA-FGM) was reported as a subtype of gastric adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to investigate the endoscopic findings of GA-FGM and to evaluate the differences between GA-FGM and GA-FG. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis was a single-center retrospective study. Participants were selected from patients with gastric cancer treated at Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, between September 2007 and May 2020. Patients histologically diagnosed with GA-FGM or GA-FG were enrolled, and endoscopic findings were analyzed in detail.

resultsA total of 12 GA-FGM lesions (12 patients) and 14 GA-FG lesions (13 patients) were analyzed. The two lesion types showed similar features: most lesions were of elevated type, located in the upper stomach, and developed in the stomach without Helicobacter pylori infection. On conventional endoscopy using the dye-spraying method, well-demarcated fine granular areas were observed in 7 GA-FGM lesions (58%) but not in any GA-FG lesions, with a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.001). Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (NBI) showed that 11 GA-FGM lesions (92%) met the diagnostic criteria for cancer according to the vessel plus surface classification system, whereas none of the GA-FG lesions met the same criteria (0%, 0/14) (P = 0.001).

conclusionOur results suggest that magnifying endoscopy with NBI is a potentially useful method for the diagnosis of GA-FGM.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedFemaleGastric FundusGastric MucosaGastroscopyHelicobacter pyloriHumansJapanMaleRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsConventional endoscopyGastric adenocarcinoma of fundic-gland mucosa typeGastric adenocarcinoma of fundic-gland typeMagnifying endoscopyNarrow-band imaging

Identifiers

PMID34241719
OpenAlexW3177669250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.