ArticleLasers in medical science2022
The application of feature engineering in establishing a rapid and robust model for identifying patients with glioma.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The emerging applications and advancements of Raman spectroscopy in pediatric cancers.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Raman spectroscopy: A prospective intraoperative visualization technique for gliomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of Raman spectroscopy with feature engineering and machine learning algorithms for detecting glioma patients. In this study, we used Raman spectroscopy technology to collect serum spectra of glioma patients and healthy people and used feature engineering-based classification models for prediction. First, to reduce the dimensionality of the data, we used two feature extraction algorithms which are partial least squares (PLS) and principal component analysis (PCA). Then, the principal components were selected using the feature selection methods of four correlation indexes, namely, Relief-F (RF), the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), the F-score (FS) and term variance (TV). Finally, back-propagation neural network (BP), linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and support vector machine (SVM) classification models were established. To improve the reliability of the model, we used a fivefold cross validation to measure the prediction performance between different models. In this experiment, 33 classification models were established. Integrating 4 classification criteria, PLS-Relief-F-BP, PLS-F-Score-BP, PLS-LDA and PLS-Relief-F-SVM had better effects, and their accuracy rates reached 97.58%, 96.33%, 97.87% and 96.19%, respectively. The experimental results show that feature engineering can select more representative features, reduce computational time complexity and simplify the model. The classification model established in this experiment can not only increase the robustness of the model and shorten the discrimination time but also realize the rapid, stable and accurate diagnosis of glioma patients, which has high clinical application value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.