Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34241680›Full record

ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2022

Croatian version of the neck disability index can distinguish between acute, chronic and no neck pain : Results of a validation study.

Jure Aljinović, Blaž Barun, Ana Poljičanin, Ivanka Marinović, Tonko Vlak, Dinko Pivalica, Benjamin Benzon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jure AljinovićInstitute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation with Rheumatology, University Hospital Split, Šoltanska 1, 21000, Split, Croatia. jure.aljinovic@mefst.hr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9546-3777
Blaž BarunInstitute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation with Rheumatology, University Hospital Split, Šoltanska 1, 21000, Split, Croatia.
Ana PoljičaninInstitute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation with Rheumatology, University Hospital Split, Šoltanska 1, 21000, Split, Croatia.
Ivanka MarinovićInstitute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation with Rheumatology, University Hospital Split, Šoltanska 1, 21000, Split, Croatia.
Tonko VlakInstitute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation with Rheumatology, University Hospital Split, Šoltanska 1, 21000, Split, Croatia.
Dinko PivalicaInstitute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation with Rheumatology, University Hospital Split, Šoltanska 1, 21000, Split, Croatia.
Benjamin BenzonDepartment of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology and Neuroscience, University of Split, School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.
University of Split · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLongitudinal study to test the validity and reliability of the Croatian version of the neck disability index (NDI-CRO) for use in patients.

methodsThree groups were given NDI-CRO on two occasions, 48 h apart: acute whiplash neck injury group (n = 30), hospital physiotherapists-professional chronic neck pain group (n = 56) and control group (n = 65). To test validity, correlation between NDI-CRO and the pain VAS and PHQ‑9 questionnaire for depression was analyzed. Reliability testing was done using the test-retest experiment and item-total score correlation.

resultsTest-retest showed excellent correlation in all groups: whiplash 0.86, control 0.95 and physiotherapist 0.89 (Spearman r). Item-total score in the 3 analyzed groups showed positive correlation in all 10 categories, varying from 0.43-0.85. The NDI-CRO score showed significant difference between groups (median whiplash 38%, physiotherapist 12% and control 6%, p < 0.05). Validity testing showed positive correlation between NDI and pain VAS (control r = 0.63, physiotherapist r = 0.68 and whiplash r = 0.83, p < 0.05) and PHQ‑9 (control r = 0.49, physiotherapist r = 0.71 and whiplash r = 0.69, p < 0.05). No correlation was found between NDI-CRO and age, gender or radiographic findings. In the whiplash injury group 75% of patients showed moderate to severe disability. The majority of physiotherapists showed mild to moderate disability due to neck pain while 40% showed no disability. In the control group two out of three people reported no disability.

conclusionThe NDI-CRO is a valid index for measuring the degree of neck disability in people with acute and chronic neck pain and in control group. It is strongly correlated with pain VAS and PHQ‑9 index.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationNeck PainHumansLongitudinal StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesCar accidentDepressionNeck painPhysiotherapistStiffnessWhiplash injury

Identifiers

PMID34241680
OpenAlexW3178599027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.