Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34241642›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2021

Dynamics of coherent activity between cortical areas defines a two-stage process of top-down attention.

E Levichkina, M Kermani, Y B Saalmann, T R Vidyasagar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Spectral Distribution Dynamics across Different Attentional Priority States.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E LevichkinaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3523-554X
M KermaniDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3872-2290
Y B SaalmannDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8880-6698
T R VidyasagarDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia. trv@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4148-2048

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 251600National Health and Medical Research Council 454676National Health and Medical Research Council 628668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysing a visual scene requires the brain to briefly keep in memory potentially relevant items of that scene and then direct attention to their locations for detailed processing. To reveal the neuronal basis of the underlying working memory and top-down attention processes, we trained macaques to match two patterns presented with a delay between them. As the above processes are likely to require communication between brain regions, and the parietal cortex is known to be involved in spatial attention, we simultaneously recorded neuronal activities from the interconnected parietal and middle temporal areas. We found that mnemonic information about features of the first pattern was retained in coherent oscillating activity between the two areas in high-frequency bands, followed by coherent activity in lower frequency bands mediating top-down attention on the relevant spatial location. Oscillations maintaining featural information also modulated activity of the cells of the parietal cortex that mediate attention. This could potentially enable transfer of information to organize top-down signals necessary for selective attention. Our results provide evidence in support of a two-stage model of visual attention where the first stage involves creating a saliency map representing a visual scene and at the second stage attentional feedback is provided to cortical areas involved in detailed analysis of the attended parts of a scene.

Indexed as

NeuronsParietal LobeAnimalsBrainBrain MappingMacacaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMemory, Short-TermPhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionMid-temporal cortexOscillationsParietal cortexPrimatesVisual attention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.