ArticleJAMA network open2021
Effectiveness and Safety of Apatinib Plus Chemotherapy as Neoadjuvant Treatment for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03192735 (Apatinib Combined With Oxaliplatin and Gimeracil and Oteracil Porassium Capsules Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cance), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Apatinib Combined With Oxaliplatin and Gimeracil and Oteracil Porassium Capsules Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cance: A Multicentre, One-armed, Clinical Pilot Trial
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimal neoadjuvant regimens for locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy-based neoadjuvant regimens in locally advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis based on high-quality clinical trials.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Optimal timing of surgery for gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023Pooled it
- The optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2022Pooled it
- Pathologic Response of Phase III Study: Perioperative Camrelizumab Plus Rivoceranib and Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (DRAGON IV/CAP 05).Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Neoadjuvant camrelizumab and apatinib combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for locally advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter randomized phase 2 trial.Nature communications · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Clinical efficacy and safety of apatinib plus S-1 combined with oxaliplatin (SOX) in postoperative stage III gastric cancer patients with high VEGFR-2 expression.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- [Reflections on surgical management strategies for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunotherapy].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026Review
- Aminated fullerene-based nanoplatform enables synergistic VEGFR2-targeted anti-angiogenesis and tumor immunotherapy.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Perioperative camrelizumab and apatinib combined with chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer in China: three-year survival outcomes of phase 2 randomized controlled trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Neoadjuvant Treatment Based on Gastric Cancer Molecular Subtyping: Chemotherapy, Immunotherapy, or Targeted Therapy?-A Retrospective Analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- A literature review of recent advances in gastric cancer treatment: exploring the cross-talk between targeted therapies.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Article
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer: a real - world retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Targeted therapies in neoadjuvant treatment for gastroesophageal cancer.Ecancermedicalscience · 2025Review
- Clinical advances and challenges of anti-angiogenic targeted therapy in gastric cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Apatinib is a novel treatment option for chemotherapy-refractory advanced gastric cancer (GC), but it has not been evaluated in patients with locally advanced GC. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of apatinib combined with S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) as a neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced GC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, prospective, single-group, open-label, phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted in 10 centers in southern China. Patients with M0 and either clinical T2 to T4 or N+ disease were enrolled between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2019. Statistical analysis was performed from December 1, 2019, to January 31, 2020. Interventions: Eligible patients received apatinib (500 mg orally once daily on days 1 to 21 and discontinued in the last cycle) plus SOX (S-1: 40-60 mg orally twice daily on days 1 to 14; oxaliplatin: 130 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1) every 3 weeks for 2 to 5 cycles. A D2 gastrectomy was performed 2 to 4 weeks after the last cycle. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was R0 resection rate. Secondary end points were the response rate, toxic effects, and surgical outcome. Results: A total of 48 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.2 [8.2] years; 37 men [77.1%]) were enrolled in this study. Forty patients underwent surgery (38 had gastrectomy, and 2 had exploratory laparotomy), with an R0 resection rate of 75.0% (95% CI, 60.4%-86.4%). The radiologic response rate was 75.0%, and T downstaging was observed in 16 of 44 patients (36.4%). The pathological response rate was 54.2% (95% CI, 39.2%-68.6%); moreover, this rate was significantly higher in patients who achieved a radiologic response compared with those who did not (12 [80.0%] vs 1 [20.0%]; P = .03) and in those who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of 0 (20 [76.9%] vs 10 [45.5%]; P = .03) or had tumors located in the upper one-third of the stomach (16 [61.5%] vs 7 [31.8%]; P = .04). Patients who achieved a pathological response (vs those who did not) had significantly less blood loss (median [range]: 60 [10-200] mL vs 80 [20-300] mL; P = .04) and significantly more lymph nodes harvested (median [range]: 40 [24-67] vs 32 [19-51]; P = .04) during surgery. Postoperative complications were observed in 7 of 38 patients (18.4%). Grade 3 toxic effects occurred in 16 of 48 patients (33.3%), and no grade 4 toxic effects or preoperative deaths were observed. Conclusions and Relevance: This nonrandomized controlled trial found that apatinib combined with SOX was effective and had an acceptable safety profile as a neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced GC. A large-scale randomized clinical trial may be needed to confirm the findings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03192735.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.