ArticleSports health
Diagnosis and Treatment of Snapping Scapula Syndrome: A Scoping Review.
Article in Sports health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Shear wave elastography in elastofibroma dorsi: lesion-based associations with pain severity and anatomical localization.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Herpes zoster rash illustrating dorsal ramus innervation in the C6 and C8 dermatomes: a report of two cases.AME case reports · 2026Article
- Full-House Arthroscopic Treatment of Snapping Scapula Syndrome: Bursectomy, Levator Scapulae Release, and Partial Scapulectomy.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Snapping of the Subacromial Bursa: A New Cause of Shoulder Pain Demonstrated with Dynamic Ultrasound.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Arthroscopic Management of Snapping Scapular Syndrome due to Recalcitrant Scapulothoracic Bursitis - A Case Series.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Combined Arthroscopic Scapulothoracic Bursectomy, Partial Scapulectomy, and Pectoralis Minor Release for the Treatment of Snapping Scapular Syndrome.Arthroscopy techniques · 2023Article
- A Targeted Approach to Post-Mastectomy Pain and Persistent Pain following Breast Cancer Treatment.Cancers · 2021Review
- Scapulothoracic Arthroscopy for Snapping Scapula Syndrome.Video journal of sports medicineArticle
- Open Excision of Snapping Scapula.Video journal of sports medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextSnapping scapula syndrome (SSS) is commonly misdiagnosed and underreported due to lack of awareness.
objectiveThis scoping review aims to summarize the current evidence related to SSS diagnosis and treatment to aid clinicians in managing the condition more effectively. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases were searched for studies related to the etiology, diagnosis, or treatment of SSS (database inception to March 2020). STUDY SELECTION: Databases were searched for available studies related to the etiology, diagnosis, or treatment of SSS. STUDY
designA scoping review study design was selected to explore the breadth of knowledge in the literature regarding SSS diagnosis and treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. DATA EXTRACTION: Primary outcomes abstraction included accuracy of diagnostic tests, functional outcomes, and pain relief associated with various nonoperative and operative treatment options for SSS.
resultsA total of 1442 references were screened and 40 met the inclusion criteria. Studies commonly reported SSS as a clinical diagnosis and relied heavily on a focused history and physical examination. The most common signs reported were medial scapular border tenderness, crepitus, and audible snapping. Three-dimensional computed tomography had high interrater reliability of 0.972, with a 100% success rate in identifying symptomatic incongruity of the scapular articular surface. Initial nonoperative treatment was reported as successful in most symptomatic patients, with improved visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (7.7 ± 0.5 pretreatment, to 2.4 ± 0.6). Persistently symptomatic patients underwent surgical intervention most commonly involving bursectomy, superomedial angle resection, or partial scapulectomy. High satisfaction rates of surgery were reported in VAS (6.9 ± 0.7 to 1.9 ± 0.9), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (50.3 ± 12.2 to 80.6 ± 14.9), and mean simple shoulder test scores (5.6 ± 1.0 to 10.2 ± 1.1).
conclusionFocused history and physical examination is the most crucial initial step in the diagnostic process, with supplemental imaging used to assess for structural etiologies when nonoperative management fails. Nonoperative management is as effective as surgical management in pain relief and is advised for 3 to 6 months before operative treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.