Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34241110›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2021

The relationship between ipsilateral cochlear gain reduction and speech-in-noise recognition at positive and negative signal-to-noise ratios.

Kristina DeRoy Milvae, Joshua M Alexander, Elizabeth A Strickland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kristina DeRoy MilvaeDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA.ORCID s0000000270692474
Joshua M AlexanderDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA.ORCID s0000000242927109
Elizabeth A StricklandDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA.ORCID s000000030118764X

Funding

COMPARATIVE AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY OF HEARINGT32DC000046 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Catherine Emily Carr, Matthew J. Goupell · 1994 to 2026
$7.5M
Diversity SupplementT32DC000030 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI Arielle Borovsky, Preeti M. Sivasankar · 1991 to 2026
$5.4M
Temporal Effects in Forward Masking, Suppression, and Simultaneous MaskingR01DC008327 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI STRICKLAND, ELIZABETH A · 2008 to 2020
$3.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008327NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000030NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active mechanisms that regulate cochlear gain are hypothesized to influence speech-in-noise perception. However, evidence of a relationship between the amount of cochlear gain reduction and speech-in-noise recognition is mixed. Findings may conflict across studies because different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were used to evaluate speech-in-noise recognition. Also, there is evidence that ipsilateral elicitation of cochlear gain reduction may be stronger than contralateral elicitation, yet, most studies have investigated the contralateral descending pathway. The hypothesis that the relationship between ipsilateral cochlear gain reduction and speech-in-noise recognition depends on the SNR was tested. A forward masking technique was used to quantify the ipsilateral cochlear gain reduction in 24 young adult listeners with normal hearing. Speech-in-noise recognition was measured with the PRESTO-R sentence test using speech-shaped noise presented at -3, 0, and +3 dB SNR. Interestingly, greater cochlear gain reduction was associated with lower speech-in-noise recognition, and the strength of this correlation increased as the SNR became more adverse. These findings support the hypothesis that the SNR influences the relationship between ipsilateral cochlear gain reduction and speech-in-noise recognition. Future studies investigating the relationship between cochlear gain reduction and speech-in-noise recognition should consider the SNR and both descending pathways.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsSpeech PerceptionHearingHumansNoiseSignal-To-Noise RatioSpeechYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34241110
PMCPMC8411890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.