Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34240576›Full record

ArticlePM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2022

Providing rehabilitation to patients recovering from COVID-19: A scoping review.

Marina B Wasilewski, Stephanie R Cimino, Kristina M Kokorelias, Robert Simpson, Sander L Hitzig, Lawrence Robinson

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Scoping review of rehabilitation care models for post COVID-19 condition.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022
    Article
  13. Providing rehabilitation to patients recovering from COVID-19: A scoping review.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marina B WasilewskiEvaluative Clinical Sciences, St. John's Rehab Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1198-2292
Stephanie R CiminoEvaluative Clinical Sciences, St. John's Rehab Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4744-5520
Kristina M KokoreliasEvaluative Clinical Sciences, St. John's Rehab Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1277-472X
Robert SimpsonEvaluative Clinical Sciences, St. John's Rehab Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7107-8679
Sander L HitzigEvaluative Clinical Sciences, St. John's Rehab Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9139-9250
Lawrence RobinsonEvaluative Clinical Sciences, St. John's Rehab Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9590-8745

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo synthesize the nature and extent of research on rehabilitation care provision to patients with COVID-19. Specifically, we aimed to (1) describe the impact of COVID on patients and associated rehabilitation needs, (2) outline the adaptations and preparations required to enable the provision of COVID rehabilitation, (3) describe the types of rehabilitation services and treatments provided to COVID patients, and (4) identify barriers and facilitators to delivering COVID rehabilitation. LITERATURE SURVEY: We searched Medline, PsychINFO, Embase, and CINAHL on June 26, 2020 using key words such as "rehabilitation," "physical medicine," "allied health professionals," and variations of "COVID." The search was updated on October 13, 2020. We included articles published in English and that focused on some aspect of COVID rehabilitation for adults. We excluded articles focused on pediatric populations and those not focused (or minimally focused) on rehabilitation for COVID patients. METHODOLOGY: Data were charted based on article type (ie, primary data, secondary data, guidelines). Key information extracted included (1) COVID sequelae; (2) rehabilitation adaptations; (3) structure, function, and content of rehabilitation services/programs; (4) facilitators and/or barriers to providing COVID rehabilitation; and (5) recommendations for COVID rehabilitation programming. Data were synthesized narratively. SYNTHESIS: In total, 128 articles were included in the review that reported primary data (n = 33), secondary data (n = 82), and clinical practice/patient self-management guidelines (n = 13). Evidence begins to suggest that rehabilitation is necessary and valuable for addressing COVID-related declines in health, function, and well-being. Most articles recommended that an individualized rehabilitation program be provided across the continuum of care by an interdisciplinary team of professionals and that the nature and extent of rehabilitation be informed by the care setting and COVID severity. Most issues that challenged COVID rehabilitation delivery were directly addressed by the facilitators and adaptations identified.

conclusionsFuture recommendations include a greater emphasis on the psychosocial aspects of COVID rehabilitation, inclusion of families in rehabilitation planning, and the use of qualitative approaches to complement clinical data.

Indexed as

COVID-19MedicineAdultChildHumansPalliative CareSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34240576
PMCPMC8441670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.