ArticleJournal of sleep research2022
Language analysis of spontaneous descriptions of restless legs syndrome: Gender differences?
Article in Journal of sleep research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primary healthcare nurses' experiences of symptoms and treatment needs of patients with RLS-associated symptoms at telephone nursing - an abductive analysis based on the Four Habits communication model.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025Article
- Experiences of sleep problems, subsequent daytime consequences, and self-care activities used to improve sleep among patients with restless legs syndrome: a qualitative content analysis.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2025Article
- Prerequisites for self-care actions in individuals with restless legs syndrome-A deductive qualitative analysis based on the COM-B model.Journal of health psychology · 2025Article
- Validation of the eHealth Literacy Scale Instrument in a Restless Legs Syndrome Population: Classical Test Theory and Rasch Analysis Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Experiences of facilitators and barriers for fulfilment of human needs when living with restless legs syndrome: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024Article
- The psychometric properties of the Pearlin Mastery Scale in persons living with restless legs syndrome.PloS one · 2024Article
- Language analysis of spontaneous descriptions of restless legs syndrome: Gender differences?Journal of sleep research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS) use various terms when describing their symptoms. Whether gender might influence this has not been investigated so far. The aim of this study was to evaluate possible gender differences in spontaneous descriptions of RLS symptoms. This prospective study, conducted in 100 consecutive German-speaking RLS patients, used a single standardized question. Answers were digitally recorded and transcribed. A content-related linguistic analysis of the transcripts was performed by two independent blinded raters. The lengths of the answers and content-related linguistic features were compared between women and men. Ninety-eight patients were included in the final analysis, 59 women (60.2%) and 39 men (39.8%), with a median age of 62 (23-94) and 63 (31-82) years, respectively (p = 0.602). Demographic and clinical features, including educational level and RLS treatment class, did not differ between genders (p > 0.05). Total word or sentence count showed no gender differences (p = 0.159 and 0.259, respectively), although men used more words per sentence than women (p = 0.018). More men than women described quiescegenic (i.e., triggered by rest or inactivity) symptoms (p = 0.006) and successful attempts at relief (p = 0.039). There was a non-significant trend toward a more frequent use of the first-person perspective in men (median times used = 5 [0-10.5] vs. 3.8 [0-17.5], p = 0.068). The more frequent mention of quiescegenic symptoms and successful attempts at relief in men could indicate differences in phenotypic presentation of RLS between genders, a more precise description of RLS symptoms or a higher experience of self-efficacy in men compared to women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.