Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34240501›Full record

ArticleJournal of sleep research2022

Language analysis of spontaneous descriptions of restless legs syndrome: Gender differences?

Evi Holzknecht, Frank Domahs, Elisabeth Brandauer, Melanie Bergmann, Tugba Zengin, Margarete Delazer, Margarethe Hochleitner, Birgit Högl, Ambra Stefani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sleep research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Evi HolzknechtDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2078-7472
Frank DomahsUniversity of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Elisabeth BrandauerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Melanie BergmannDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0097-4396
Tugba ZenginDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Margarete DelazerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Margarethe HochleitnerGender Medicine and Diversity Unit, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Birgit HöglDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Ambra StefaniDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4259-8824

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS) use various terms when describing their symptoms. Whether gender might influence this has not been investigated so far. The aim of this study was to evaluate possible gender differences in spontaneous descriptions of RLS symptoms. This prospective study, conducted in 100 consecutive German-speaking RLS patients, used a single standardized question. Answers were digitally recorded and transcribed. A content-related linguistic analysis of the transcripts was performed by two independent blinded raters. The lengths of the answers and content-related linguistic features were compared between women and men. Ninety-eight patients were included in the final analysis, 59 women (60.2%) and 39 men (39.8%), with a median age of 62 (23-94) and 63 (31-82) years, respectively (p = 0.602). Demographic and clinical features, including educational level and RLS treatment class, did not differ between genders (p > 0.05). Total word or sentence count showed no gender differences (p = 0.159 and 0.259, respectively), although men used more words per sentence than women (p = 0.018). More men than women described quiescegenic (i.e., triggered by rest or inactivity) symptoms (p = 0.006) and successful attempts at relief (p = 0.039). There was a non-significant trend toward a more frequent use of the first-person perspective in men (median times used = 5 [0-10.5] vs. 3.8 [0-17.5], p = 0.068). The more frequent mention of quiescegenic symptoms and successful attempts at relief in men could indicate differences in phenotypic presentation of RLS between genders, a more precise description of RLS symptoms or a higher experience of self-efficacy in men compared to women.

Indexed as

Restless Legs SyndromeFemaleHumansLanguageMaleProspective StudiesSex Factorsfemaleinterviewlinguisticmalesexspeech

Identifiers

PMID34240501
PMCPMC9285969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.