Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34240429›Full record

ArticleAllergy2022

Molecular definition of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 receptor-binding domain mutations: Receptor affinity versus neutralization of receptor interaction.

Monique Vogel, Gilles Augusto, Xinyue Chang, Xuelan Liu, Daniel Speiser, Mona O Mohsen, Martin F Bachmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Protein-Protein Binding Kinetics by Biolayer Interferometry.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Monique VogelDepartment of Immunology, Inselspital, University clinic of Rheumatology and Immunology, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5219-4033
Gilles AugustoThe Jenner Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Cellular and Molecular Physiology (CCMP), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6509-0148
Xinyue ChangDepartment of Immunology, Inselspital, University clinic of Rheumatology and Immunology, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7027-3889
Xuelan LiuDepartment of Immunology, Inselspital, University clinic of Rheumatology and Immunology, Bern, Switzerland.
Daniel SpeiserDepartment of Immunology, Inselspital, University clinic of Rheumatology and Immunology, Bern, Switzerland.
Mona O MohsenDepartment of Immunology, Inselspital, University clinic of Rheumatology and Immunology, Bern, Switzerland.
Martin F BachmannDepartment of Immunology, Inselspital, University clinic of Rheumatology and Immunology, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

International Immunology Center, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, ChinaSaiba AGSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 31003A_185114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral new variants of SARS-CoV-2 have emerged since fall 2020 which have multiple mutations in the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein. It is unclear which mutations affect receptor affinity versus immune recognition.

methodsWe produced wild type RBD, RBD with single mutations (E484K, K417N, or N501Y) or with all three mutations combined and tested their binding to ACE2 by biolayer interferometry (BLI). The ability of convalescent sera to recognize RBDs and block their interaction with ACE2 was tested as well.

resultsWe demonstrated that single mutation N501Y increased binding affinity to ACE2 but did not strongly affect its recognition by convalescent sera. In contrast, single mutation E484K had almost no impact on the binding kinetics, but essentially abolished recognition of RBD by convalescent sera. Interestingly, combining mutations E484K, K417N, and N501Y resulted in a RBD with both features: enhanced receptor binding and abolished immune recognition.

conclusionsOur data demonstrate that single mutations either affect receptor affinity or immune recognition while triple mutant RBDs combine both features.

Indexed as

Receptors, VirusSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2COVID-19COVID-19 SerotherapyHumansImmunization, PassiveMutationProtein BindingACE2 protein, humanAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Receptors, VirusSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2ACE2affinityneutralizationRBDSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34240429
PMCPMC8441680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.