Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34240112›Full record

ReviewDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2021

Understanding small ORF diversity through a comprehensive transcription feature classification.

Diego Guerra-Almeida, Diogo Antonio Tschoeke, Rodrigo Nunes-da-Fonseca

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Current zoology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Peptidome: Chaos or Inevitability.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diego Guerra-AlmeidaIntegrated Laboratory of Morphofunctional Sciences, Institute of Biodiversity and Sustainability, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Diogo Antonio TschoekeHealth Systems Engineering Laboratory, Alberto Luiz Coimbra Institute of Graduate Studies and Engineering Research (COPPE), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rodrigo Nunes-da-FonsecaIntegrated Laboratory of Morphofunctional Sciences, Institute of Biodiversity and Sustainability, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Funding

Lacrimal Gland Repair Using Progenitor CellsR01EY026202 · NEI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI MAKARENKOVA, HELEN P. · 2016 to 2025
$5.2M
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPqCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - FAPERJ D.A.T.: E-26/202.736/2019; R.N.-da-F.: E-26/211.169/2019, E-26/202.605/2019, E-210.264/2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small open reading frames (small ORFs/sORFs/smORFs) are potentially coding sequences smaller than 100 codons that have historically been considered junk DNA by gene prediction software and in annotation screening; however, the advent of next-generation sequencing has contributed to the deeper investigation of junk DNA regions and their transcription products, resulting in the emergence of smORFs as a new focus of interest in systems biology. Several smORF peptides were recently reported in non-canonical mRNAs as new players in numerous biological contexts; however, their relevance is still overlooked in coding potential analysis. Hence, this review proposes a smORF classification based on transcriptional features, discussing the most promising approaches to investigate smORFs based on their different characteristics. First, smORFs were divided into non-expressed (intergenic) and expressed (genic) smORFs. Second, genic smORFs were classified as smORFs located in non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) or canonical mRNAs. Finally, smORFs in ncRNAs were further subdivided into sequences located in small or long RNAs, whereas smORFs located in canonical mRNAs were subdivided into several specific classes depending on their localization along the gene. We hope that this review provides new insights into large-scale annotations and reinforces the role of smORFs as essential components of a hidden coding DNA world.

Indexed as

PeptidesRNA, UntranslatedHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingOpen Reading FramesRNA, MessengerPeptidesRNA, MessengerRNA, Untranslatedalternative ORFsdual functional RNAgenome annotationlong non-coding RNAsmORF peptides

Identifiers

PMID34240112
PMCPMC8435553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.