Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34240097›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2021

Dual dean entrainment with volume ratio modulation for efficient droplet co-encapsulation: extreme single-cell indexing.

Jack Harrington, Luis Blay Esteban, Jonathan Butement, Andres F Vallejo, Simon I R Lane, Bhavwanti Sheth, Maaike S A Jongen, Rachel Parker, Patrick S Stumpf, Rosanna C G Smith and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Confocal Absorbance-Activated Droplet Sorting (cAADS) for Enzyme Engineering.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. On-chip dielectrophoretic single-cell manipulation.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jack HarringtonCancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK. J.J.West@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2926-1223
Luis Blay EstebanFaculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4675-6957
Jonathan ButementCancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK. J.J.West@soton.ac.uk.
Andres F VallejoClinical and Experimental Sciences, Sir Henry Wellcome Laboratories, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4688-0598
Simon I R LaneFaculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, UK.
Bhavwanti ShethSchool for Biological Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, UK.
Maaike S A JongenCancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK. J.J.West@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5768-8227
Rachel ParkerCancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK. J.J.West@soton.ac.uk.
Patrick S StumpfCentre for Human Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK.
Rosanna C G SmithCancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK. J.J.West@soton.ac.uk.
Ben D MacArthurInstitute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, UK.
Matthew J J Rose-ZerilliCancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK. J.J.West@soton.ac.uk.
Marta E PolakClinical and Experimental Sciences, Sir Henry Wellcome Laboratories, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2878-476X
Tim UnderwoodCancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK. J.J.West@soton.ac.uk.
Jonathan WestCancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK. J.J.West@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5709-6790

Funding

Cancer Research UK 23924Medical Research Council MC_PC_15078Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 109377/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The future of single cell diversity screens involves ever-larger sample sizes, dictating the need for higher throughput methods with low analytical noise to accurately describe the nature of the cellular system. Current approaches are limited by the Poisson statistic, requiring dilute cell suspensions and associated losses in throughput. In this contribution, we apply Dean entrainment to both cell and bead inputs, defining different volume packets to effect efficient co-encapsulation. Volume ratio scaling was explored to identify optimal conditions. This enabled the co-encapsulation of single cells with reporter beads at rates of ∼1 million cells per hour, while increasing assay signal-to-noise with cell multiplet rates of ∼2.5% and capturing ∼70% of cells. The method, called Pirouette coupling, extends our capacity to investigate biological systems.

Indexed as

Biological AssaySingle-Cell AnalysisNoise

Identifiers

PMID34240097
PMCPMC8383763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.