Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34239962›Full record

ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2021

A Two Question Screen for Mental Health Opportunities.

Prakash Jayakumar, Joost T P Kortlever, Laura E Brown, David Ring

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Prakash JayakumarUK Harkness Fellowship in Health Care Policy and Practice Innovations, The Value Institute / Department of Surgery and Peri-operative Care, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA.
Joost T P KortleverDepartment of Surgery and Peri-operative Care, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA.
Laura E BrownCenter for Health Communication, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA.
David RingDepartment of Surgery and Peri-operative Care, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShortened versions of validated PRO measures of coping strategies e.g. PSEQ-2, may facilitate screening and monitoring of psychological conditions such as depression and anxiety. The primary research question in this study assesses the sensitivity and specificity of a PSEQ-2 score of less than 10 for important symptoms of depression (a PHQ-2 score greater than 2), anxiety (GAD-2 score greater than 2), any impactful prior episode of psychological trauma, and QuickDASH greater than 49. Secondarily we assess the associations between self-efficacy and other demographic and psychological factors on the magnitude of limitations and pain intensity.

methodsWe performed a retrospective PRO evaluation in 926 adult patients attending an upper extremity clinic between 1

resultsA PSEQ-2 scoring threshold of less than 10 was 81% sensitive for a PHQ-2 score of 3 or greater, 84% sensitive for a GAD-2 score of 3 or greater, 84% sensitive for one or more important psychological traumas, and 82% sensitive for a QuickDASH of 50 or greater. PSEQ-2 less than 10 was independently associated with greater upper extremity limitations (β=11 [6.3 to 17, 95% Confidence interval [C.I],

conclusionA PSEQ-2 score of less than 10 might, along with verbal and non-verbal signs of distress, be a useful way to introduce the use of more sensitive screening questionnaires about anxiety or depression, or open up the option of speaking directly to mental or social health professionals. Future studies are required to test this hypothesis.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionPatient outcomesPsychological factorsResiliencySelf-efficacyStress

Identifiers

PMID34239962
PMCPMC8221434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.